ABSOLUTE JUDICIAL IMMUNITY MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE: AN ARGUMENT FOR AN EXCEPTION TO JUDICIAL IMMUNITY.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1071By:Stengel, Timothy M.Publication type:Article
MATTERS OF PERSPECTIVE: RESTORING PLAINTIFFS' STORIES TO INDIVIDUAL DISPARATE TREATMENT LAW.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 4, p. 1031By:Sopher, Paul J.Publication type:Article
INNOVATIVE BREAKTHROUGH OR MONOPOLY BULLYING?: DETERMINING ANTITRUST LIABILITY OF DOMINANT FIRMS IN EXCLUSIONARY PRODUCT REDESIGN CASES.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 4, p. 995By:Smith, Nicholas S.Publication type:Article
PROMOTING WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT THROUGH ANTINUISANCE LEGISLATION.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 4, p. 955By:Marandola, TylerPublication type:Article
LIES, DAMN LIES, AND POLYGRAPHS: THE PROBLEMATIC ROLE OF POLYGRAPHS IN POSTCONVICTION SEX OFFENDER TREATMENT (PCSOT).Published in:2012By:Maloney, Douglas C.Publication type:Opinion
AVOIDING CONFRONTATION.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 4, p. 863By:Egerman, MarkPublication type:Article
ENGLISH JUDGES AND ROMAN JURISTS: THE CIVILIAN LEARNING BEHIND ENGLAND'S FIRST CASE LAW.Published in:Temple Law Review, 2012, v. 84, n. 4, p. 827By:McSweeney, ThomasPublication type:Article