Taking Aim at the Hydra: Why the "Allied-Party Doctrine" Should Not Apply in Qui Tam Cases When the Government Declines to Intervene.Published in:Review of Litigation, 2004, v. 23, n. 3, p. 629By:Mahaffey Jr., George S.Publication type:Article
False Conflicts and Faulty Analyses: Judicial Misuse of Governmental Interests in the Second Restatement of Conflict of Laws.Published in:Review of Litigation, 2004, v. 23, n. 3, p. 489By:George, James P.Publication type:Article
Testing the Outer Limits of Commercial Speech: Its First Amendment Implications.Published in:Review of Litigation, 2004, v. 23, n. 3, p. 607By:Kuhne III, Cecil C.Publication type:Article
Case Study: Does I v. The Gap, Inc.: Can a Sweatshop Suit Settlement Save Saipan?Published in:Review of Litigation, 2004, v. 23, n. 3, p. 737By:Smith, Erin GeigerPublication type:Article
Democracies Dies Behind Closed Doors: Post-September 11th Immigration Proceedings, The Creppy Directive, and Public Access.Published in:Review of Litigation, 2004, v. 23, n. 3, p. 717By:Hammill, Hunter A.Publication type:Article
Rendering a Taxing New Tide on I.R.C. § 501 (c)(3): The Constitutional Implications of H.R. 2357 and Alternatives for Increased Political Freedom in Houses of Worship.Published in:Review of Litigation, 2004, v. 23, n. 3, p. 691By:Benjamin S. de LeonPublication type:Article