NO "DEAD GIVEAWAYS": FINDING A VIABLE MODEL OF ANTE-MORTEM PROBATE FOR NEW JERSEY.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1683
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 05865964 AND DT 2018 AND VI 48 AND IP 4
Results: 26
1
2
MAKE CAMPAIGN COVERAGE GREAT AGAIN: PRESIDENTIAL CAMPAIGNS, THE PRESS, AND THE RIGHT OF ACCESS.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1653
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
YOU STAY CLASSY ADVISORY COMMITTEE: THE NEED TO AMEND RULE 23 TO INCLUDE EXPLICIT ASCERTAINABILITY IN THE WAKE OF SANDUSKY WELLNESS CENTER, LLC V. MEDTOX SCIENTIFIC, INC.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1627
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
SOLITARY CONFINEMENT REFORM ACT: A BLUEPRINT FOR RESTRICTED USE OF SOLITARY CONFINEMENT OF JUVENILES ACROSS THE STATES.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1601
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
The Persistence of the Probabilistic Perspective.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1589
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Craig Callen on the Burden of Proof.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1569
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Spotting a Preponderance of the Evidence in the Wild: Inference to the Best Explanation and Sufficiency of the Evidence.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1517
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
An Introduction to Craig R. Callen's Spotting a Preponderance of the Evidence in the Wild.
- Published in:
- 2018
- By:
- Publication type:
- Obituary
9
A Brief Reply to Professor Cassell.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1493
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
Tradeoffs Between Wrongful Convictions and Wrongful Acquittals: Understanding and Avoiding the Risks.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1435
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
The Anti-Blackstonians.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1319
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
Reducing Error in the Criminal Justice System.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1265
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Comment on Laudan.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1255
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Expert Testimony and the Epistemology of Disagreement.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1199
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
Refryed Forensics: Screening Expert Testimony in Criminal Cases Through Frye Plus Reliability.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1161
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
Debunked, Discredited, but Still Defended: Why Prosecutors Resist Challenges to Bad Science and Some Suggestions for Crafting Remedies for Wrongful Conviction Based on Changed Science.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Different Strokes for Different Folks: Fixing the Error Pattern in Criminal Prosecutions by "Empiricizing" the Rules of Criminal Law and Taking False Acquittals and Serial Offenders Seriously.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1243
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
The Science and Law Underlying Post-Conviction Challenges to Shaken Baby Syndrome Convictions: A Response to Professor Imwinkelried.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1209
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
A Brief Comment on the Response By Professors Findley and Risinger to My Original Contribution to Professor Risinger's Symposium.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1229
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Surprise vs. Probability as a Metric for Proof.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1081
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Debunked, Discredited, but Still Defended Revising State Post-Conviction Relief Statutes To Cover Convictions Resting On Subsequently Invalidated Expert Testimony.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1095
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
22
Common Sense on Standards of Proof.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1057
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
23
Epistemology, Psychology, and Standards of Proof: An Essay on Risinger's "Surprise" Theory.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1039
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
24
Formalism and Potential Surprise: Theorizing About Standards of Proof.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 1017
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
25
The Declining Utility of Analyzing Burdens of Persuasion.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 995
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
26
Leveraging Surprise: What Standards of Proof Imply that We Want from Jurors, and What We Should Say to Them to Get It.
- Published in:
- Seton Hall Law Review, 2018, v. 48, n. 4, p. 965
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article