BIVENS V. STATE: IS THE PROCESS REALLY "DUE"?
- Published in:
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 239
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 03649458 AND DT 2019 AND VI 44 AND IP 2
Results: 6
1
2
RIDINGS V. MAZE: SHOULD THE OKLAHOMA SUPREME COURT LOOSEN THE REINS AND ALLOW RECOVERY FOR EMOTIONAL DISTRESS UNDER THE BYSTANDER THEORY?
- Published in:
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 221
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
SHELBY COUNTY V. HOLDER: OUT WITH THE OLD & IN WITH THE NEW, TIME FOR A NEW FORMULA.
- Published in:
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 183
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
DRAFTING CRIMINAL DIRECT APPEALS IN OKLAHOMA: A PRACTICAL GUIDE.
- Published in:
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 151
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
"ALEXA, ARE YOU LISTENING?" USING CARPENTER AND TRADITIONAL PROPERTY-BASED FOURTH AMENDMENT ANALYSES TO DETERMINE HOW VOICE ASSISTANT DATA CAN BE PROTECTED UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT.
- Published in:
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 117
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
TRESPASSING UNDER THE SURFACE: DOES HYDRAULICALLY FRACTURING ACROSS BOUNDARIES CONSTITUTE ACTIONABLE TRESPASS?
- Published in:
- Oklahoma City University Law Review, 2019, v. 44, n. 2, p. 83
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article