Works matching IS 03051498 AND DT 2013 AND VI 35 AND IP 2
1
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 241, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0072
- Article
2
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 253, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0073
- Article
3
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 255, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0074
- Article
4
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 258, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0075
- Article
5
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 143, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0067
- Article
6
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 261, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0076
- Article
7
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 165, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0068
- Article
8
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 263, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0077
- Article
9
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 267, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0078
- Article
10
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 139, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0066
- Article
11
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 271, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0079
- Article
12
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 189, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0069
- Article
13
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 221, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0071
- Article
14
- Oxford Literary Review, 2013, v. 35, n. 2, p. 205, doi. 10.3366/olr.2013.0070
- Article