Found: 8
Select item for more details and to access through your institution.
Ontology for human talk and thought (not robotics).
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 47, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.003
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics.
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.001
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Replies to comments.
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.008
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Is semantics computational?
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.006
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Comments on: Fritz Hamm, Hans Kamp, Michiel van Lambalgen, There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics.
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 41, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.002
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Representing events and discourse; comments on Hamm, Kamp and van Lambalgen.
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 57, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.004
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The future of semantics?
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 91, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.007
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
What is an action-based model of interpretation?
- Published in:
- Theoretical Linguistics, 2006, v. 32, n. 1, p. 65, doi. 10.1515/TL.2006.005
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article