Works matching IS 0277318X AND DT 2013 AND VI 43 AND IP 4

Results: 19

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SELF INCRIMINATION AND THE RIGHT TO COUNSEL--OREGON ADHERES TO INDEPENDENT STATE CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS IN DISMISSING DEFENDANT'S ANTICIPATORY INVOCATION OF RIGHTS STATE v. DAVIS, 256 P.3D 1075 (Or. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 895

By:

Van Sciver, Alicia

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--EQUAL PROTECTION--THE INDIANA SUPREME COURT'S LESS THAN RATIONAL BASIS REVIEW OF EQUAL PROTECTION CLAIMS RESULTED IN THE VALIDATION OF THE INDIANA VOTER ID LAW. LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF INDIANA, INC. v. ROKITA, 929 N.E.2d 758 (IND. 2010).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 873

By:

Roseman, Adam

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--DUE PROCESS--THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MARYLAND REMAINS IN LOCKSTEP WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT. COST v. STATE, 10 A.3D 184 (MD. 2010).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 853

By:

Raskys, Mike

Publication type:

Article

CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SEARCH AND SEIZURE--TARNISHING THE REVERSE SILVER PLATTER: HAWAII JURISPRUDENCE TAKES A STEP FORWARD IN UPHOLDING THE PRIMACY OF ITS CONSTITUTION WHEN APPLYING THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE. STATE v. TORRES, 262 P.3D 1006 (HAW. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 919

By:

Williamson, Steven G.

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW -- RIGHT TO APPEAR AND DEFEND (CONFRONTATION) AND RIGHT TO TESTIFY -- SPECIFIC INFERENCES OF TAILORING DURING CROSS-EXAMINATION OF A CRIMINAL DEFENDANT DO NOT VIOLATE ARTICLE I, SECTION 22 OF THE WASHINGTON CONSTITUTION. STATE v. MARTIN, 252 P.3D 872 (WASH. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 935

By:

Winegar, Andrew S.

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-EDUCATION FUNDING--EVIDENCE OF A CORRELATION BETWEEN POOR SCHOOL FUNDING AND POOR STUDENT PERFORMANCE MUST BE PRESENTED TO RENDER A SCHOOL FUNDING SYSTEM UNCONSTITUTIONAL. DAVIS v. STATE, 804 N.W.2D 618 (S.D. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 835

By:

O'Reilly, Patrick A.

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SELF-INCRIMINATION--WARNINGS GIVEN TO A DEFENDANT THAT HE HAD A RIGHT TO COUNSEL PRIOR TO POLICE INTERROGATION WERE SUFFICIENT UNDER FEDERAL AND STATE INTERPRETATIONS OF SELF-INCRIMINATION LAW. RIGTERINK v. STATE, 66 SO. 3D 866 (Fla. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 817

By:

O'Neill, Augusta

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SEPARATION OF POWERS--WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT ERRONEOUSLY DECLINED REVIEW OF LEGISLATURE'S VIOLATION OF OPEN MEETINGS LAW. OZANNE v. FITZGERALD, 798 N.W.2d 436 (WIS. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 797

By:

Miccio, Scott

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--CONFIRMATION OF INFERIOR STATE OFFICERS AND THE JUDICIAL RESTRUCTURING OF THE PLENARY POWERS OF THE KENTUCKY GENERAL ASSEMBLY. FOX v. GRAYSON, 317 S.W.3d 1 (Ky. 2010).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 669

By:

Garner, Daniel

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SEARCH AND SEIZURE--THE WASHINGTON SUPREME COURT MISTAKENLY INTERPRETS AND ADOPTS THE FEDERAL ATTENUATION DOCTRINE DESPITE CLEAR STATE PRECEDENT. STATE v. ESERJOSE, 259 P.3D 172 (Wash. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 747

By:

Ma, Jessica

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--PRIVACY--SEARCH AND SEIZURE--DO INDIVIDUALS HAVE A REASONABLE EXPECTATION OF PRIVACY IN THEIR CELL PHONE CONVERSATIONS? STATE v. ALLEN, 241 P.3D 1045 (Mont. 2010).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 725

By:

Lerner, Jason D.

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--RECALL ELECTIONS--THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT HOLDS THE RECALL OF U.S. SENATORS UNDER STATE LAW UNCONSTITUTIONAL. COMM. TO RECALL ROBERT MENENDEZ FROM THE OFFICE OF U.S. SENATOR v. WELLS, 7 A.3D 720 (N.J. 2010).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 705

By:

Kim, Jennifer

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--EQUAL PROTECTION--MINNESOTA SUPREME COURT'S FAILURE TO RESOLVE ITS INCONSISTENT EQUAL PROTECTION JURISPRUDENCE. STATE v. COX, 798 N.W.2d 517 (Minn. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 689

By:

Karpf, Alyssa

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT EDUCATION--THE RIGHT TO A THOROUGH AND EFFICIENT SYSTEM OF EDUCATION TRUMPS THE POWER OF THE APPROPRIATIONS CLAUSE IN NEW JERSEY. ABBOTT v. BURKE, 20 A.3D 1018 (N.J. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 771

By:

Marra, Amanda

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW-SEARCH AND SEIZURE-WARRANTLESS AND SUSPICIONLESS SEARCH OF PAROLEE'S HOTEL ROOM BY A GENERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL VIOLATES ARTICLE I, SECTION 8 OF THE IOWA CONSTITUTION. STATE v. OCHOA, 792 N.W.2D 260 (IOWA 2010).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 651

By:

Duffy, Liam

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT--MORE THAN JUST AN I.Q. TEST MAY BE NEEDED TO SHOW INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY. COLEMAN v. STATE, 341 S.W.3d 221 (Tenn. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 635

By:

Cotton, Thomas

Publication type:

Article

STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW--SINGLE SUBJECT RULE--THE ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT ADOPTS AN IRREBUTABLE PRESUMPTION OF CONSTITUTIONALITY FOR LEGISLATION CHALLENGED BY THE SINGLE SUBJECT RULE. WIRTZ v. QUINN, 953 N.E.2d 899 (Ill. 2011).

Published in:

Rutgers Law Journal, 2013, v. 43, n. 4, p. 617

By:

Apadula, Giuliano

Publication type:

Article

DIMENSIONS OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE.

Published in:

2013

By:

Marshfield, Jonathan L.

Publication type:

Book Review

THE POLITICAL QUESTION DOCTRINE IN STATE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.

Published in:

2013

By:

Rodriguez, Daniel B.

Publication type:

Essay