Many thanks to Bioethics reviewers.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 1000, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12831
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 02699702 AND DT 2020 AND VI 34 AND IP 9
Results: 21
1
2
Symposium on risks to bystanders in clinical research: An introduction.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
3
Study bystanders and ethical treatment of study participants—A proof of concept.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 941, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12825
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Bystanders and ethical review of research: Proceed with caution.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 937, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12823
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Why IRBs should protect bystanders in human research.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 933, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12812
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Risky research and bystander consent.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 912, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12811
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
PRINCIPLES OF ANIMAL RESEARCH ETHICS.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
8
Gestation as mothering.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 960, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12808
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
SAVING PEOPLE FROM THE HARM OF DEATH.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
10
The role of community engagement in addressing bystander risks in research: The case of a Zika virus controlled human infection study.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 883, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12806
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
Recommendations on COVID‐19 triage: international comparison and ethical analysis.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 948, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12805
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
A more‐than‐human approach to bioethics: The example of digital health.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 969, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12798
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
What constitutes fair shared decision‐making in global health research collaborations?
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 984, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12793
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Continuous deep sedation and the doctrine of double effect: Do physicians not intend to make the patient unconscious until death if they gradually increase the sedatives?
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 977, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12792
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
THE TRUSTED DOCTOR: MEDICAL ETHICS AND PROFESSIONALISM.
- Published in:
- 2020
- By:
- Publication type:
- Book Review
16
Compensation and reparations for victims and bystanders of the U.S. Public Health Service research studies in Tuskegee and Guatemala: Who do we owe what?
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 893, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12784
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
Using, risking, and consent: Why risking harm to bystanders is morally different from risking harm to research subjects.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 899, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12743
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
The ethics of risk displacement in research and public policy.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 918, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12726
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
19
Minimal or reasonable? Considering the ethical threshold for research risks to nonconsenting bystanders and implications for nonconsenting participants.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 923, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12725
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
20
Bystanders, risks, and consent.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 906, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12673
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
21
Issue Information.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2020, v. 34, n. 9, p. 877, doi. 10.1111/bioe.12634
- Publication type:
- Article