WHICH BENEFITS OF RESEARCH PARTICIPATION COUNT AS 'DIRECT'?
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2012, v. 26, n. 2, p. 60, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01825.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 02699702 AND DT 2012 AND VI 26 AND IP 2
Results: 8
1
2
ON USING PEOPLE MERELY AS A MEANS IN CLINICAL RESEARCH.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2012, v. 26, n. 2, p. 76, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01820.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
WHEN CONCRETIZED EMOTION-BELIEF COMPLEXES DERAIL DECISION-MAKING CAPACITY.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2012, v. 26, n. 2, p. 108, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01817.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
CONTINUING THE DEFINITION OF DEATH DEBATE: THE REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT'S COUNCIL ON BIOETHICS ON CONTROVERSIES IN THE DETERMINATION OF DEATH.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2012, v. 26, n. 2, p. 101, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01812.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
TRUSTED CONSENT AND RESEARCH BIOBANKS: TOWARDS A 'NEW ALLIANCE' BETWEEN RESEARCHERS AND DONORS.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2012, v. 26, n. 2, p. 93, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01823.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
REPORTING ON END-OF-LIFE MATTERS - ACADEMIC MEETS ACTIVISTS.
- Published in:
- 2012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Editorial
7
HARD PATERNALISM, FAIRNESS AND CLINICAL RESEARCH: WHY NOT?
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2012, v. 26, n. 2, p. 68, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01816.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
TWO STALEMATES IN THE PHILOSOPHICAL DEBATE ABOUT ABORTION AND WHY THEY CANNOT BE RESOLVED USING ANALOGICAL ARGUMENTS.
- Published in:
- Bioethics, 2012, v. 26, n. 2, p. 84, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01815.x
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article