ACTFL Oral Proficiency Interview – computer (OPIc).
- Published in:
- Language Testing, 2019, v. 36, n. 3, p. 467, doi. 10.1177/0265532219828253
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 02655322 AND DT 2019 AND VI 36 AND IP 3
Results: 7
1
2
Language assessment literacy in university admission policies, or the dialogue that isn't.
- Published in:
- Language Testing, 2019, v. 36, n. 3, p. 347, doi. 10.1177/0265532219826390
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
Patterns of variation in the interplay of language ability and general reading comprehension ability in L2 reading.
- Published in:
- Language Testing, 2019, v. 36, n. 3, p. 369, doi. 10.1177/0265532219826379
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Student self-assessment of oral explanations: Use of language learning progressions.
- Published in:
- Language Testing, 2019, v. 36, n. 3, p. 391, doi. 10.1177/0265532219826330
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
A generalizability theory study of optimal measurement design for a summative assessment of English/Chinese consecutive interpreting.
- Published in:
- Language Testing, 2019, v. 36, n. 3, p. 419, doi. 10.1177/0265532218809396
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Using the ACTFL OPIc to assess proficiency and monitor progress in a tertiary foreign languages program.
- Published in:
- Language Testing, 2019, v. 36, n. 3, p. 439, doi. 10.1177/0265532218798139
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
The role of foreign language anxiety on L2 utterance fluency during a final exam.
- Published in:
- Language Testing, 2019, v. 36, n. 3, p. 327, doi. 10.1177/0265532218777783
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article