LOST IN INTERPRETATION: LOZES V. WATERSON AND NON-CONFORMING USES IN NEW ORLEANS.Published in:Loyola Law Review, 2021, v. 68, n. 1, p. 1By:Leonhard, ChunlinPublication type:Article
UNWILLING TO REMEDY THE PAST: THE COST TO STATE RELIANCE INTERESTS TRUMPS ANY BENEFITS OF REDRESSING CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS IN EDWARDS V. VANNOY.Published in:Loyola Law Review, 2021, v. 68, n. 1, p. 195By:Hegeler, ParkPublication type:Article
LEADERS OF A BEAUTIFUL STRUGGLE V. BALTIMORE POLICE DEPARTMENT: THE FOURTH AMENDMENT CONTINUES ITS STRUGGLE TO MAKE SENSE OF THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY.Published in:Loyola Law Review, 2021, v. 68, n. 1, p. 159By:Havener, Scott A.Publication type:Article
PERMANENT INCORRIGIBILITY OR PROCEDURAL POINT: JUVENILE SENTENCING CONSIDERATIONS IN JONES V. MISSISSIPPI.Published in:Loyola Law Review, 2021, v. 68, n. 1, p. 129By:Finney, PeterPublication type:Article
FULTON V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA: RELIGIOUS OBJECTORS, HISTORICALLY MARGINALIZED COMMUNITIES, AND A MISSED OPPORTUNITY.Published in:Loyola Law Review, 2021, v. 68, n. 1, p. 95By:Beck, DavidPublication type:Article