CHILDHOOD OBESITY: WHY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT SHOULD ENACT LEGISLATION TO MEET THE GOALS OF THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT BY RESOLVING A GROWING ISSUE.Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 307By:Neal, Gabrielle R.Publication type:Article
ZOMBIE POWERS OF ATTORNEY: THE UNIFORM ANATOMICAL GIFT ACT OF 2006 AND THE DURABLE UNDEAD POWER OF ATTORNEY FOR HEALTH CARE.Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 285By:Smith, Sutton JamesPublication type:Article
THE DYNAMICS OF THE CONTEMPORARY LAW SCHOOL CLASSROOM: LOOKING AT LAPTOPS THROUGH A LEARNING STYLE LENS.Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 201By:DeGrofF, Eric A.Publication type:Article
FUNDAMENTAL OR FUNDAMENTALLY FLAWED? A CRITIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT'S APPROACH TO THE SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS DOCTRINE UNDER THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT.Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2014, v. 39, n. 2, p. 261By:Dunlop, Branson D.Publication type:Article