REVIVING THE KNOCK AND ANNOUNCE RULE AND CONSTRUCTIVELY ABOLISHING NO-KNOCK ENTRIES BY GIVING THE PEOPLE A GROUND THEY CAN STAND ON.Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 381By:Yeaples-Coleman, Amanda M.Publication type:Article
NOT IN YOUR BACKYARD: OHIO'S PROHIBITION ON RESIDENCY REQUIREMENTS FOR POLICE OFFICERS, FIREFIGHTERS, AND OTHER MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES.Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 351By:Mulligan, JoePublication type:Article
A CAUTIONARY TALE OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING IN PUBLIC EDUCATION: A TEACHER'S RIGHT OR TAIL WAGGING THE DOG?Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 317By:Russo, Charles J.Publication type:Article
INTERNATIONAL EXTRADITION AND PLEA, IMMUNITY, AND COOPERATION AGREEMENTS.Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 303By:Iraola, RobertoPublication type:Article
THE VALIDITY OF THE 2010 FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 26 AMENDMENT GOVERNING THE WAIVER OF WORK PRODUCT PROTECTION: IS THE WORK PRODUCT DOCTRINE AN EVIDENTIARY PRIVILEGE?Published in:University of Dayton Law Review, 2012, v. 37, n. 3, p. 279By:Imwinkelried, Edward J.Publication type:Article