WITH GREAT POWER COMES IGNORED RESPONSIBILITY: HOW THE SUPREME COURT FAILED TO SAVE SPIDER-MAN.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 3, p. 751
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 01479857 AND DT 2017 AND VI 49 AND IP 3
Results: 6
1
2
"THE MORE YOU BUY, THE BIGGER YOUR TAX BREAK": WHY THE NINTH CIRCUIT IN VOSS V. COMMISSIONER ERRED IN INTERPRETING THE DEBT LIMITATIONS OF THE HOME MORTGAGE INTEREST DEDUCTION.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 3, p. 729
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
RFRA AND THE AFFORDABLE CARE ACT: DOES THE CONTRACEPTION MANDATE DISCRIMINATE AGAINST RELIGIOUS EMPLOYERS?
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 3, p. 661
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
SPREAD TOO THIN: THE CASE FOR FEDERALLY MANDATED MINIMUM NURSE-TO-PATIENT RATIOS IN HOSPITALS.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 3, p. 635
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
APPLE WATCH-ING YOU: WHY WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY SHOULD BE FEDERALLY REGULATED.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 3, p. 607
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
INSIDER TRADING LAW THAT WORKS: USING NEWMAN AND SALMAN TO UPDATE DIRKS'S PERSONAL BENEFIT STANDARD.
- Published in:
- Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, 2017, v. 49, n. 3, p. 575
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article