Works matching IS 0140525X AND DT 1991 AND VI 14 AND IP 1
Results: 106
Reconciling Fechner and Stevens?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 188, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X0006605X
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Dead men tell odd simple tales!
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 187, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066048
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Opponent processes in classical conditioning: The jury is still out.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 199, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066097
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Psychophysical law: Taming the cognitive and chaotic aspects.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 193, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066073
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Neural and behavioral assessments of sensory quantity.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 192, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066061
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The search for convincing experimental tests of conditioned drug effects.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 201, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066115
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The placebo effect as a conditioned response: Failures of the “litmus test”.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 200, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066103
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Reflections from the peer review mirror.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 167, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066024
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
What to do about peer review: Is the cure worse than the disease?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 166, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066012
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Do peer reviewers really agree more on rejections than acceptances? A random-agreement benchmark says they do not.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 165, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00066000
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Chairman's action: The importance of executive decisions in peer review.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 164, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065997
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The process of peer review: Unanswered questions.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 158, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065924
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Reflections on the peer review process.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 157, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065912
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Disagreement among journal reviewers: No cause for undue alarm.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 163, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065985
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Toward openness and fairness in the review process.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 161, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X0006595X
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Some indices of the reliability of peer review.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 160, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065948
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Is unreliability in peer review harmful?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 159, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065936
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
In praise of randomness.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 162, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065973
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Now that we know how low the reliability is, what shall we do?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 162, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065961
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Justice, efficiency and epistemology in the peer review of scientific manuscripts.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 157, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065900
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Should the blinded lead the blinded?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 156, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065894
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Why is the reliability of peer review so low?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 154, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065882
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Do we really want more “reliable” reviewers?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 152, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065870
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Confusion between reviewer reliability and wise editorial and funding decisions.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 151, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065869
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Referee agreement in context.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 150, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065857
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Is there an alternative to peer review?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 149, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065845
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Replication, reliability and peer review: A case study.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 149, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065833
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
On forecasting validity and finessing reliability.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 148, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065821
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Peer review is not enough: Editors must work with librarians to ensure access to research.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 147, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X0006581X
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Journal availability and the quality of published research.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 146, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065808
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
When nonreliability of reviews indicates solid science.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 145, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065791
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Peer review: Explicit criteria and training can help.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 144, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065778
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Models are just prostheses for our brains.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065547
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Different rates of agreement on acceptance and rejection: A statistical artifact?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 144, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X0006578X
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Consensus and the reliability of peer-review evaluations.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 140, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065730
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
State variable models are powerful, not perfect.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 104, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065572
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Let evolution take care of its own.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065559
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The “crooked bookie” cycle.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 103, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065560
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
What should be done improve reviewing?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 143, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065766
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Evaluating scholarly works: How many reviewers? How much anonymity?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 142, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065754
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Unreliable peer review: Causes and cures of human misery.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 141, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065742
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Limits to stochastic dynamic programming.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 101, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065535
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Does group discussion contribute reliability of complex judgments?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 139, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065729
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The predictive validity of peer review: A neglected issue.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 138, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065717
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 137, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065705
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Does the need for agreement among reviewers inhibit the publication controversial findings?
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 136, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065699
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Peer review: An unflattering picture.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 135, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065687
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 119, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065675
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Dynamic optimization: Let's get on with the job.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 110, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065663
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Testing predictions and gaining insights from dynamic state-variable models.
- Published in:
- Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 1991, v. 14, n. 1, p. 109, doi. 10.1017/S0140525X00065651
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article