FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF THE MEDICAID ACT: WHY THE EQUAL ACCESS CLAUSE CREATES PRIVATELY ENFORCEABLE RIGHTS.Published in:Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 3, p. 791By:Jessee, SeanPublication type:Article
PUBLIC HEALTH VS. PATIENT RIGHTS: RECONCILING INFORMED CONSENT WITH HPV VACCINATION.Published in:Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 3, p. 761By:Kochuba, Margaret J.Publication type:Article
HOW TO PREVENT HARD CASES FROM MAKING BAD LAW: BEAR STEARNS, DELAWARE, AND THE STRATEGIC USE OF COMITY.Published in:Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 3, p. 713By:Kahan, Marcel;Rock, EdwardPublication type:Article
CAN THERE BE A DEMOCRATIC JURISPRUDENCE?Published in:Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 3, p. 675By:Waldron, JeremyPublication type:Article
AN ORIGINALIST DEFENSE OF SUBSTANTIVE DUE PROCESS: MAGNA CARTA, HIGHER-LAW CONSTITUTIONALISM, AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT.Published in:Emory Law Journal, 2009, v. 58, n. 3, p. 585By:Gedicks, Frederick MarkPublication type:Article