WISCONSIN IS OPEN FOR BUSINESS OR BUSINESS JUST AS USUAL? THE PRACTICAL EFFECTS AND IMPLICATIONS OF 2011 WISCONSIN ACT 2.Published in:Wisconsin Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1245By:IRGENS, KRISTENPublication type:Article
LET THE MASTER ANSWER: WHY THE DOCTRINE OF RESPONDEAT SUPERIOR SHOULD BE USED TO ADDRESS EGREGIOUS PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT RESULTING IN WRONGFUL CONVICTIONS.Published in:Wisconsin Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1215By:MCKAY, ALISHA L.Publication type:Article
FEDERAL CIRCUIT PATENT PRECEDENT: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF INSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY IDEOLOGY.Published in:Wisconsin Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1177By:PEKAREK KROHN, DAVID R.;TILLER, EMERSON H.Publication type:Article
GAINING ASSURANCES.Published in:Wisconsin Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1137By:LEE, JULIA Y.Publication type:Article
AN INVISIBLE UNION FOR AN INVISIBLE LABOR MARKET: COLLEGE FOOTBALL AND THE UNION SUBSTITUTION EFFECT.Published in:Wisconsin Law Review, 2012, v. 2012, n. 5, p. 1077By:LEROY, MICHAEL H.Publication type:Article