WRONGFULLY DISCHARGED IN-HOUSE COUNSEL: A PROPOSAL TO GIVE THE EMPLOYER A VETO OVER REINSTATEMENT WHILE GIVING THE TERMINATED LAWYER FRONT PAY.Published in:Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 4, p. 649By:Lidge III, Ernest F.Publication type:Article
CUTTING TIES: EXAMINING THE SOCIAL, ECONOMIC, AND POLITICAL IMPLICATIONS OF INCONSISTENT EUROPEAN UNION STATE AID INTERPRETATIONS ON MULTINATIONAL BUSINESSES.Published in:Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 4, p. 713By:Lee, Spencer A.Publication type:Article
SAVING NO ONE: UNIFYING APPROACHES TO THE UVTA SAVINGS CLAUSE.Published in:Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 4, p. 697By:Jouppi, Daniel E.Publication type:Article
THE IMPACT OF STATE RELIGIOUS FREEDOM RESTORATION ACTS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE INTERPRETIVE CASE LAW.Published in:Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 4, p. 585By:Dhooge, Lucien J.Publication type:Article
WRONGLY AFFIRMED WITHOUT OPINION.Published in:Wake Forest Law Review, 2017, v. 52, n. 4, p. 561By:Crouch, DennisPublication type:Article