THE "CRISIS OF EXPERTISE" REACHES THE COURTROOM: AN INTRODUCTION TO THE SYMPOSIUM ON, AND A RESPONSE TO, EDWARD CHENG'S CONSENSUS RULE.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 837By:CAUDILL, DAVID S.Publication type:Article
THE CONSENSUS RULE: JUDGES, JURORS, AND ADMISSIBILITY HEARINGS.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 883By:EVANS, ROBERTPublication type:Article
THE ADVERSITY OF ADVERSARIALISM: HOW THE CONSENSUS RULE REPRODUCES THE EXPERT PARADOX.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 893By:WEINEL, MARTINPublication type:Article
THE OWLS: SOME DIFFICULTIES IN JUDGING SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 877By:COLLINS, HARRYPublication type:Article
EMBRACING DEFERENCE.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 855By:CHENG, EDWARD K.;CURRIER, ELODIE O.;HAMPTON, PAYTON B.Publication type:Article
THE CONSENSUS RULE: LESSONS FROM THE REGULATORY WORLD.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2022, v. 67, n. 5, p. 907By:WAGNER, WENDYPublication type:Article