HICKORY HICKORY DOCK, THE NEW JERSEY SUPREME COURT STOPS THE CLOCK: LEGISLATURE. MUST REFORM THE SPILL ACT FOLLOWING MORRISTOWN ASSOCIATES v. GRANT OIL.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 2, p. 351By:SALVEMINI, MARIAPublication type:Article
PENNSYLVANIA STACKS THE DECK AGAINST DEFENDANTS IN COMMONWEALTH v. ALICIA, LEAVING FALSE CONFESSION ASSESSMENTS TO THE JURY.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 2, p. 321By:REAMY, KATHERINEPublication type:Article
#GUILTY? SUBLET v. STATE AND THE AUTHENTICATION OF SOCIAL MEDIA EVIDENCE IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 2, p. 287By:FLANAGAN, ELIZABETH A.Publication type:Article
SHE WORKS HARD FOR THE MONEY WHEREVER SHE IS: THE NEED TO ABANDON THE PHYSICAL PRESENCE PRESUMPTION IN TELECOMMUNICATION CASES FOLLOWING EEOC v. FORD.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 2, p. 261By:CAULFIELD, SEANPublication type:Article
HOME IS WHERE THE CONFUSION IS: PENNSYLVANIA FORMALLY ADOPTS THE "GIST OF THE ACTION" DOCTRINE AND BUILDS A HOUSE FOR AMBIGUITY IN BRUNO v. ERIE INSURANCE CO.Published in:Villanova Law Review, 2016, v. 61, n. 2, p. 235By:ANTHONY, LAURENPublication type:Article