THE FUTURE OF RESIDUAL CLAUSE INTERPRETATION: "SHANKING" THE COMMENTARY AND SIMPLIFYING SENTENCING ENHANCEMENT ANALYSIS AFTER UNITED STATES v. MOBLEY.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 337
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 00426229 AND DT 2013 AND VI 58 AND IP 2
Results: 5
1
2
WHAT'S YOUR PRIORITY?: REVITALIZING PENNSYLVANIA'S APPROACH TO EQUITABLE SUBROGATION OF MORTGAGES AFTER FIRST COMMONWEALTH BANK v. HELLER.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 301
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
TREATING A CHRONIC CASE OF DISCRIMINATION: THE NINTH CIRCUIT'S PRESCRIPTION FOR MENTAL HEALTH PATIENTS' RIGHTS IN HARLICK v. BLUE SHIELD.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 269
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
A PREFERENCE FOR DEFERENCE: THE BENEFITS OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT'S CUSTOMIZED STANDARD OF REVIEW FOR COLLECTION DUE PROCESS APPEALS IN DALTON v. COMMISSIONER.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 239
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
PLEASE BE DELICATE WITH MY PERMANENT RECORD: THE PENDULUM INCHES TOWARDS ABSOLUTE PRIVILEGE IN MERKAM v. WACHOVIA.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2013, v. 58, n. 2, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article