Works matching IS 00419907 AND DT 2000 AND VI 148 AND IP 6

Results: 15

BEYOND MATURITY: MASS TORT CASE MANAGEMENT IN THE MANUAL FOR COMPLEX LITIGATION.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2225, doi. 10.2307/3312785

By:

Willging[a], Thomas E.

Publication type:

Article

PENN LAW SCHOOL MASS TORTS SYMPOSIUM: A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR COOPER.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2001, doi. 10.2307/3312778

By:

Becker[a], Edward R.;
Marcus[b], Jerome M.

Publication type:

Article

AGGREGATION AND SETTLEMENT OF MASS TORTS.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 1943, doi. 10.2307/3312777

By:

Cooper[a], Edward H.

Publication type:

Article

BACK TO THE FUTURES: PRIVATIZING FUTURE CLAIMS RESOLUTION.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 1919, doi. 10.2307/3312775

By:

Mullenix[a], Linda S.

Publication type:

Article

FEDERALISM AND MASS TORT LITIGATION.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2263, doi. 10.2307/3312786

By:

Trangsrud[a], Roger

Publication type:

Article

COMMENTARY ON THE FUTURES PROBLEM, BY GEOFFREY C. HAZARD, JR.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 1933, doi. 10.2307/3312776

By:

Wood[a], Diane P.

Publication type:

Article

ETHICS MATTERS, TOO: THE SIGNIFICANCE OF PROFESSIONAL REGULATION OF ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS IN MASS TORT LITIGATION--A RESPONSE TO JUDITH RESNIK.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2209, doi. 10.2307/3312784

By:

Moore[a], Nancy J.

Publication type:

Article

THOUGHTS ABOUT PROFESSOR RESNIK'S PAPER.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2197

By:

Higginbotham[a], Patrick E.

Publication type:

Article

MONEY MATTERS: JUDICIAL MARKET INTERVENTIONS CREATING SUBSIDIES AND AWARDING FEES AND COSTS IN INDIVIDUAL AND AGGREGATE LITIGATION.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2119, doi. 10.2307/3312782

By:

Resnik[a], Judith

Publication type:

Article

A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR RESNICK: WILL THIS VEHICLE PASS INSPECTION?

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2095

By:

Gibson[a], S. Elizabeth

Publication type:

Article

BANKRUPTCY AS A VEHICLE FOR RESOLVING ENTERPRISE-THREATENING MASS TORT LIABILITY.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2045, doi. 10.2307/3312780

By:

Resnick[a], Alan N.

Publication type:

Article

BENIGN NEGLECT RECONSIDERED.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 2009, doi. 10.2307/3312779

By:

Marcus[a], Richard L.

Publication type:

Article

THE FUTURES PROBLEM.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 1901, doi. 10.2307/3312774

By:

Hazard JR.[a], Geoffrey C.

Publication type:

Article

A RESPONSE TO PROFESSOR FRANCIS E. MCGOVERN'S PAPER ENTITLED TOWARD A COOPERATIVE STRATEGY FOR FEDERAL AND STATE JUDGES IN MASS TORT LITIGATION.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 1897, doi. 10.2307/3312773

By:

Veasey[a], E. Norman

Publication type:

Article

TOWARD A COOPERATIVE STRATEGY FOR FEDERAL AND STATE JUDGES IN MASS TORT LITIGATION.

Published in:

University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2000, v. 148, n. 6, p. 1867, doi. 10.2307/3312772

By:

McGovern[a], Francis E.

Publication type:

Article