Works matching IS 00286087 AND DT 2017 AND VI 48 AND IP 2
1
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 387, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0018
- Article
2
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 363, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0017
- Article
3
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 337, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0016
- Article
4
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 309, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0015
- Article
5
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 285, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0014
- Article
6
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 265, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0013
- Article
7
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0012
- Article
8
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 223, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0011
- Article
11
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 387, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0018
- Article
12
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 363, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0017
- Article
13
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 337, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0016
- Article
14
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 309, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0015
- Article
15
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 285, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0014
- Article
16
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 265, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0013
- Article
17
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 245, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0012
- Article
18
- New Literary History, 2017, v. 48, n. 2, p. 223, doi. 10.1353/nlh.2017.0011
- Article