BANGOR GAS: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LAW COURT'S DECISION IN OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC ADVOCATE V PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION.Published in:Maine Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 400By:Talmage, TaylorPublication type:Article
MICHIGAN V. EPA AND THE EROSION OF CHEVRON DEFERENCE.Published in:Maine Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 382By:Schratz, ConnorPublication type:Article
BROWN V DELTA TAUDELTA: IN A CLAIM OF PREMISES LIABILITY, HOW FAR SHOULD THE LAW COURT GO TO ASSIGN A DUTY OF CARE?Published in:Maine Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 364By:Franklin, TobyPublication type:Article
KEEPING KIDS FIRST: TRIAL COURT DISCRETION AND THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CHILD IN LIGHT V D 'AMATO.Published in:Maine Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 348By:Abraham, Stanley W.Publication type:Article
REVIVING MAINE'S STATE CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTION AGAINST UNREASONABLE SEARCHES AND SEIZURES.Published in:Maine Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 322By:Drake, Jamesa J.Publication type:Article
GENERAL JURISDICTION 2.0: THE UPDATING AND UPROOTING OF THE CORPORATE PRESENCE DOCTRINE.Published in:Maine Law Review, 2016, v. 68, n. 2, p. 288By:Cavanagh, Edward D.Publication type:Article