MARKET REALITIES DO NOT EMBODY NECESSARY ECONOMIC THEORY: WHY DEFENDANTS DESERVE A SAFE HARBOR UNDER SECTION 2 OF THE SHERMAN ACT FOR EXCLUSIVE DEALING.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 249By:Paschal, Danielle NicolePublication type:Article
SEEN BUT NOT HEARD: AN ARGUMENT FOR GRANTING EVIDENTIARY HEARINGS TO WEIGH THE CREDIBILITY OF RECANTED TESTIMONY.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 213By:Hill, Michael McDonnellPublication type:Article
WHEN DELEGATION BEGETS DOMINATION: DUE PROCESS OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAWMAKING.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 117By:Criddle, Evan J.Publication type:Article
PROMULGATING PROPORTIONALITY.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 69By:Berry, William W.Publication type:Article
THE JUDICIAL POWER AND THE INFERIOR FEDERAL COURTS: EXPLORING THE CONSTITUTIONAL VESTING THESIS.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1By:Spencer, A. BenjaminPublication type:Article
GEORGIA LAWREVIEW.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2011, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1By:Miller, Hillary ClairePublication type:Article