THE PANIC DEFENSE AND MODEL RULES COMMON SENSE: A PRACTICAL SOLUTION FOR A TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY ETHICAL DILEMMA.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 2, p. 621By:Garmon, Teresa MariePublication type:Article
ERISA SUBROGATION AND THE CONTROVERSY OVER SEREBOFF: SILENCING THE CRITICS, THE DIVIDED BENCH IS A LEGITIMATE STANDARD.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 2, p. 579By:Prebula Frazier, Ashley AunitaPublication type:Article
ENTHUSIASTIC ENFORCEMENT, INFORMAL LEGISLATION: THE UNRULY EXPANSION OF THE FOREIGN CORRUPT PRACTICES ACT.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 2, p. 489By:Westbrook, Amy DeenPublication type:Article
ECONOMIC LOSS, PUNITIVE DAMAGES, AND THE EXXON VALDEZ LITIGATION.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 2, p. 409By:Perry, RonenPublication type:Article
RETHINKING THE COMMERGIAL LAW TREATY.Published in:Georgia Law Review, 2010, v. 45, n. 2, p. 345By:Coyle, John F.Publication type:Article