DNA AS PATENTABLE SUBJECT MATTER AND A NARROW FRAMEWORK FOR ADDRESSING THE PERCEIVED PROBLEMS CAUSED BY GENE PATENTS.Published in:Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 3, p. 731By:Schilling, Stephen H.Publication type:Article
REFORMING ATTEMPT LIABILITY UNDER 18 U.S.C. § 2422(B): AN INSUBSTANTIAL STEP BACK FROM UNITED STATES V. ROTHENBERG.Published in:Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 3, p. 693By:Christensen, Korey J.Publication type:Article
INTERPRETIVE FREEDOM: A NECESSARY COMPONENT OF ARTICLE III JUDGING.Published in:Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 3, p. 651By:Bandy, Jennifer M.Publication type:Article
TURNING UNAMBIGUOUS STATUTORY MATERIALS INTO AMBIGUOUS STATUTES: ORDERING PRINCIPLES, AVOIDANCE, AND TRANSPARENT JUSTIFICATION IN CASES OF INTERPRETIVE CHOICE.Published in:Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 3, p. 583By:González, Carlos E.Publication type:Article
WHAT IS SECURITIES FRAUD?Published in:Duke Law Journal, 2011, v. 61, n. 3, p. 511By:Buell, Samuel W.Publication type:Article