SHIFTING THE COSTS TO THOSE BEST ABLE TO BEAR THEM: AN ARGUMENT FOR THE ADOPTION OF PURE ECONOMIC LOSS IN THE EVENT OF AN OIL PIPELINE SPILL IN NEBRASKA.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 1, p. 115By:Watson, RyanPublication type:Article
TEXAS RICE LAND PARTNERS, LTD. V. DENBURY GREEN PIPELINE-TEXAS, LLC: A PROBABILITY OF FUTURE USE BY THE PUBLIC AS A KEY TO EXERCISING EMINENT DOMAIN.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 1, p. 89By:Ramirez, Gregory S.Publication type:Article
KEYSTONE XL: THE PIPELINE TO ENERGY SECURITY.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 1, p. 61By:TERRY, LEEPublication type:Article
THE KEYSTONE PIPELINE ADDITION: ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF REDUCED GASOLINE PRICES AND INCREASED NATIONAL SECURITY.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 1, p. 27By:SLADE, EDWINPublication type:Article
THIRST FOR OIL AND THE KEYSTONE XL PIPELINE.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 46, n. 1, p. 1By:KALEN, SAMPublication type:Article