THE STRONG ARM OF THE LAW IS WEAK: HOW THE TRAFFICKING VICTIMS PROTECTION ACT FAILS TO ASSIST EFFECTIVELY VICTIMS OF THE SEX TRADE.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 563By:George, ShellyPublication type:Article
DON'T YOU DARE LIVE HERE: THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE ANTI-IMMIGRANT EMPLOYMENT AND HOUSING ORDINANCES AT ISSUE IN KELLER V. CITY OF FREMONT.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 503By:Varley, Ashleigh Bausch;Snow, Mary C.Publication type:Article
WHAT DID MORK SAY TO MINDY WHEN HE FORGOT TO REGISTER? PANNU, PANNU! WHAT PANNU V. HOLDER REVEALS ABOUT CRIMES INVOLVING MORAL TURPITUDE AND FAILURE-TO-REGISTER STATUTES.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 617By:Strong, Shane E.Publication type:Article
"HE'S NOT YOUR REAL DAD": IN UNITED STATES V. FLORES-VILLAR, TILE NINTH CIRCUIT ERRONEOUSLY DENIED EQUAL PROTECTION THAT WOULD ENABLE A FATHER TO TRANSMIT UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP TO HIS FOREIGN-BORN CHILD.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 581By:Newhouse, EricPublication type:Article
STANDING BEAR V. CROOK: THE CASE FOR EQUALITY UNDER WAAXE'S LAW.Published in:Creighton Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 3, p. 455By:Nagle, Mary KathrynPublication type:Article