Connecting you to content on EBSCOhost

Works matching IS 00111155 AND DT 2007 AND VI 40 AND IP 4

Results: 7

1

ADAPT OF PHILADELPHIA V. PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY: THE THIRD CIRCUIT CORRECTLY DETERMINED PREMATURELY APPEALED DISCOVERY ORDERS COULD NOT LATER RIPEN WITH SUBSEQUENT ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT BUT FAILED TO EXAMINE THE VALIDITY OF THE CRITICIZED CAPE MAY GREENE RULE

Published in:

Creighton Law Review, 2007, v. 40, n. 4, p. 807

By:

Smeltzer, Katrina L.

Publication type:

Article

2

THE SUPREME COURT OF WASHINGTON MISTAKENLY APPLIES STATE LAW RESULTING IN INVALIDATION OF ARBITRATION PROVISIONS IN KRUGER CLINIC ORTHOPAEDICS, LLC V. REGENCE BLUESHIELD.

Published in:

Creighton Law Review, 2007, v. 40, n. 4, p. 777

By:

Nevers, Russell A.

Publication type:

Article

3

KNIGHTS OF THE ROUND TABLE: PARTICIPANT SELECTION MECHANISM FOR COURT-RELATED DELIBERATIONS.

Published in:

Creighton Law Review, 2007, v. 40, n. 4, p. 733

By:

Azulay, Keren

Publication type:

Article

4

IN SEARCH OF THE TRANSACTION OR OCCURRENCE: COUNTERCLAIMS.

Published in:

Creighton Law Review, 2007, v. 40, n. 4, p. 699

By:

McFarland, Douglas D.

Publication type:

Article

5

THE ARBITRATION CLAUSE IN CONTEXT: HOW CONTRACT TERMS DO (AND DO NOT) DEFINE THE PROCESS.

Published in:

Creighton Law Review, 2007, v. 40, n. 4, p. 655

By:

Weidemaier, W. Mark C.

Publication type:

Article

6

FOREWORD: PRETRIAL LITIGATION, DISPUTE RESOLUTION, AND THE RARITY OF TRIAL.

Published in:

Creighton Law Review, 2007, v. 40, n. 4, p. 651

By:

Pearlstein, Arthur

Publication type:

Article

7

OF "PURPOSES NOT PROHIBITED": NEW FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 408(B).

Published in:

Creighton Law Review, 2007, v. 40, n. 4, p. 679

By:

Collins, Gregory B.;
Halaby, Andrew F.

Publication type:

Article