THE DISPUTE THRESHOLD: HOW THE PUBLIC POLICY RATIONALE FAILS TO GUIDE THE APPLICATION OF FEDERAL RULE OF EVIDENCE 408.Published in:Cornell Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 4, p. 997By:Ma, Steve Y.Publication type:Article
DEMYSTIFYING CONCEPTUAL SEVERANCE: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE UNITED STATES, CANADA, AND THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS.Published in:Cornell Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 4, p. 965By:Chang, AngelaPublication type:Article
THE SPLIT BENEFIT: THE PAINLESS WAY TO PUT SKIN BACK IN THE HEALTH CARE GAME.Published in:2013By:Robertson, ChristopherPublication type:Essay
DECONSTRUCTING INDEPENDENT AGENCIES (AND EXECUTIVE AGENCIES).Published in:Cornell Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 4, p. 769By:Datla, Kirti;Revesz, Richard L.Publication type:Article
THE LAST TEMPTATION OF CONGRESS: LEGISLATOR INSIDER TRADING AND THE FIDUCIARY NORM AGAINST CORRUPTION.Published in:Cornell Law Review, 2013, v. 98, n. 4, p. 845By:Sung Hui KimPublication type:Article