TORPEDOING A TRANSACTION: ECONOMIC SUBSTANCE VERSUS OTHER TAX DOCTRINES AND THE APPLICATION OF THE STRICT LIABILITY PENALTY.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 1, p. 109By:VANIK JR., THOMAS C.Publication type:Article
THE NATIONAL IMPERATIVE FOR HEALTH CARE SYSTEM TRANSFORMATION: WHY CERTAIN MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS ARE APPROPRIATE DESPITE SECTION 7 OF THE CLAYTON ACT.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 1, p. 83By:SARGENT, NATHAN D.Publication type:Article
PRE-DISPUTE ARBITRATION AGREEMENTS, FREEDOM OF CONTRACT, AND THE ECONOMIC DURESS DEFENSE: A CRITIQUE OF THREE COMMENTARIES.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 1, p. 37By:FELDMAN, STEVEN W.Publication type:Article
THE RULING ON A MOTION IN LIMINE: PRESERVING THE ISSUE FOR APPEAL.Published in:Cleveland State Law Review, 2016, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1By:STOKES, MICHAEL L.Publication type:Article