SHIELDING OHIO'S NEWBORNS: DEFENDING A BROAD INTERPRETATION OF "CHILD" WITHIN THE MEANING OF O.R.C. § 3113.31.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 3, p. 719
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 00098876 AND DT 2010 AND VI 58 AND IP 3
Results: 6
1
2
ABRIDGING CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: SEXTING LEGISLATION IN OHIO.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 3, p. 685
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
TAILORING THE NARROW TAILORING REQUIREMENT IN THE SUPREME COURT'S AFFIRMATIVE ACTION CASES.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 3, p. 649
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
IS THE UNITED STATES TAX COURT EXEMPT FROM ADMINISTRATIVE LAW JURISPRUDENCE WHEN ACTING AS A REVIEWING COURT?
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 3, p. 603
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
EVALUATING CHILDREN'S COMPETENCY TO TESTIFY: DEVELOPING A RATIONAL METHOD TO ASSESS A YOUNG CHILD'S CAPACITY TO OFFER RELIABLE TESTIMONY IN CASES ALLEGING CHILD SEX ABUSE.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 3, p. 575
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
ORIGINALISM, JOHN MARSHALL, AND THE NECESSARY AND PROPER CLAUSE: RESURRECTING THE JURISPRUDENCE OF ALEXANDER ADDISON.
- Published in:
- Cleveland State Law Review, 2010, v. 58, n. 3, p. 529
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article