Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1965 AND VI 52 AND IP 9
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 711, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520920
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 716, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520931
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 641, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520902
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 685, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520913
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 715, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520924
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 663, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520906
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 699, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520917
- Milliken, James;
- Nahor, Amos;
- Fine, Jacob
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 716, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520928
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 716, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520930
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520901
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 682, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520912
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 715, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520923
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 657, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520905
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 697, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520916
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 716, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520927
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 673, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520909
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 669, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520908
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 691, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520914
- Feggetter, George Y.;
- Pringle, Robert
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 678, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520911
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 694, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520915
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 715, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520926
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 708, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520919
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 715, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520922
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 651, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520904
- Buchan, R.;
- Clark, C. G.;
- Downie, R. W. M.
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 675, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520910
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 713, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520921
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 666, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520907
- Larizadeh, R.;
- Powell, D. E. B.
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 646, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520903
- Chapman, J. H.;
- Birch, D. A.
- Article
29
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 704, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520918
- Clark, R. G.;
- Young, D. G.
- Article
30
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 715, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520925
- Article
31
- British Journal of Surgery, 1965, v. 52, n. 9, p. 716, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800520929
- Article