Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1961 AND VI 49 AND IP 215
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 332, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921520
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 348, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921531
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 241, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921502
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921542
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 300, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921513
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 351, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921553
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 345, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921524
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921535
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 255, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921506
- Holt, R. L.;
- Lythgoe, J. P.
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 350, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921546
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 317, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921517
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 352, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921557
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 347, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921528
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921539
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 348, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921530
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921501
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921541
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 292, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921512
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 351, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921552
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 343, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921523
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921534
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 253, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921505
- Edmunds, P. K. D.;
- Havard, C.
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 350, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921545
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 313, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921516
- Kirk, J.;
- Walker, W. F.;
- Walton, E. W.
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 352, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921556
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 347, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921527
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921538
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 271, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921509
- Article
29
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 351, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921549
- Article
30
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921540
- Article
31
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 288, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921511
- Paul, Milroy;
- Abeyaratne, Michael
- Article
32
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 351, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921551
- Article
33
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 342, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921522
- Article
34
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 348, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921533
- Article
35
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 250, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921504
- Mills, K. L. G.;
- Brunnen, P. L.;
- Clark, C. G.
- Article
36
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 350, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921544
- Article
37
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 307, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921515
- Article
38
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 352, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921555
- Article
39
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 347, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921526
- Article
40
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 349, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921537
- Article
41
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 266, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921508
- Article
42
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 350, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921548
- Article
43
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 322, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921519
- Article
44
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 278, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921510
- Article
45
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 351, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921550
- Article
46
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 337, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921521
- Ross, J. Cosbie;
- Nixon, Arthur
- Article
47
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 348, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921532
- Article
48
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 245, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921503
- Article
49
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 350, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921543
- Article
50
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 215, p. 303, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921514
- Jackson, N. J.;
- Nanson, E. M.
- Article