Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1961 AND VI 49 AND IP 213
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 114, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921330
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921301
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 116, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921341
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 54, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921312
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 118, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921352
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 103, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921323
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 120, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921363
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 115, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921334
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 11, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921305
- Borman, J. B.;
- Harbott, A. J.;
- Morris, D.
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 117, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921345
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 67, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921316
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 119, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921356
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 111, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921327
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 116, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921338
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 28, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921309
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 118, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921349
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 116, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921340
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 50, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921311
- Cornes, J. S.;
- Smith, J. C.;
- Southwood, W. F. W.
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 118, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921351
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 96, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921322
- Charlton, C. A. C.;
- Higton, D. I. R.;
- James, D. W.;
- Nicol, A. R.;
- Stewart, J. O.
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 120, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921362
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 115, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921333
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 8, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921304
- Painter, Neil S.;
- Zahir, M.
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 117, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921344
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 66, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921315
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 119, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921355
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 109, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921326
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 116, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921337
- Article
29
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 22, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921308
- Brown, D. B.;
- Strang, R.;
- Gordon, J.;
- Hendry, E. B.
- Article
30
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 117, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921348
- Article
31
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 80, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921319
- Dawson, I. M. P.;
- Cornes, J. S.;
- Morson, B. C.
- Article
32
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 119, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921359
- Article
33
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 37, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921310
- Partridge, John P.;
- Gough, Malcolm H.
- Article
34
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 118, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921350
- Article
35
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 92, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921321
- Smithers, D. W.;
- Gowing, N. F. C.
- Article
36
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 120, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921361
- Article
37
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 115, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921332
- Article
38
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 3, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921303
- Article
39
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 117, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921343
- Article
40
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 63, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921314
- Article
41
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 118, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921354
- Article
42
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 107, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921325
- Article
43
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 115, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921336
- Article
44
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 17, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921307
- Article
45
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 117, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921347
- Article
46
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 77, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921318
- Article
47
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 119, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921358
- Article
48
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 114, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921329
- Article
49
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 90, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921320
- Article
50
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 49, n. 213, p. 119, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004921360
- Article