Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1961 AND VI 48 AND IP 212
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 672, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821220
- Bhagwati, S. N.;
- McKissock, Wylie
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 692, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821231
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 585, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821202
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 693, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821242
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 646, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821213
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 689, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821224
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 692, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821235
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 608, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821206
- Ainley, N. J.;
- Lamb, D. C.
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 655, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821217
- Barnard, C. N.;
- McKenzie, M. B.;
- Schrire, V.
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 691, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821228
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 693, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821239
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 691, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821230
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821201
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 693, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821241
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 642, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821212
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 686, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821223
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 692, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821234
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 601, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821205
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 653, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821216
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 691, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821227
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 693, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821238
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 633, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821209
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 693, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821240
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 640, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821211
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 683, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821222
- Payne, R. A.;
- Naylor, F. D.;
- Kay, A. W.
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 692, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821233
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 598, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821204
- Beilby, J. O. W.;
- Thompson, R. E. M.
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 694, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821244
- Article
29
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 651, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821215
- Article
30
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 691, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821226
- Article
31
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 693, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821237
- Article
32
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 619, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821208
- Le Roux, B. T.;
- Wright, J. T.
- Article
33
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 667, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821219
- Article
34
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 636, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821210
- Article
35
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 677, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821221
- John, H. T.;
- Shepherd, R. C.;
- Warren, Richard
- Article
36
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 692, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821232
- Article
37
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 589, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821203
- Article
38
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 693, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821243
- Article
39
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 649, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821214
- Article
40
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 691, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821225
- Article
41
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 692, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821236
- Article
42
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 611, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821207
- Article
43
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 663, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821218
- Ross, J. Cosbie;
- Gow, James G.;
- St. Hill, C. A.
- Article
44
- British Journal of Surgery, 1961, v. 48, n. 212, p. 691, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004821229
- Article