Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1959 AND VI 46 AND IP 200
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 660, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620043
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 615, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620014
- Darke, C. S.;
- Chesterman, J. T.
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 651, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620025
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 658, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620036
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 588, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620007
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 660, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620047
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 629, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620018
- Bruce, A. W.;
- Stalker, A. L.
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 657, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620029
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 638, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620020
- Lawrie, Peter;
- Angus, G. Elspeth;
- Reese, A. J. M.
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 657, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620031
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. A1, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620002
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 660, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620042
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 608, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620013
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 649, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620024
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 658, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620035
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 586, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620006
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 660, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620046
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 625, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620017
- Ritchie, John B.;
- Smith, Adam N.
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 657, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620028
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 659, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620039
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 657, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620030
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620001
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 659, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620041
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 606, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620012
- Patterson, T. J. S.;
- Till, K.
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 647, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620023
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 658, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620034
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 582, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620005
- Das, John B.;
- Dodge, O. G.;
- Fawcett, A. W.
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 660, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620045
- Article
29
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 624, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620016
- Article
30
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 656, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620027
- Article
31
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 659, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620038
- Article
32
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 597, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620009
- Article
33
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 661, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620049
- Article
34
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 659, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620040
- Article
35
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 603, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620011
- Article
36
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 645, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620022
- Article
37
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 658, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620033
- Article
38
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 574, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620004
- Article
39
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 660, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620044
- Article
40
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 621, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620015
- Ross, James A.;
- Tough, Ian C. K.
- Article
41
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 652, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620026
- Article
42
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 659, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620037
- Article
43
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 593, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620008
- Article
44
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 661, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620048
- Article
45
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 634, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620019
- Article
46
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 601, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620010
- Shoesmith, J. H.;
- Crone, W. P.
- Article
47
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 642, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620021
- Gillespie, J. A.;
- Burns, J. K.
- Article
48
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 657, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620032
- Article
49
- British Journal of Surgery, 1959, v. 46, n. 200, p. 561, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18004620003
- Article