Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1950 AND VI 38 AND IP 150
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 255, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815038
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 206, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815009
- Marks, K. L.;
- Turner, W. L.
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 223, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815011
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 250, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815022
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 254, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815033
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 163, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815004
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 242, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815015
- Jones, H. Morus;
- Ross, C. F.
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 251, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815026
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 255, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815037
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 200, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815008
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 249, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815019
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 210, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815010
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 250, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815021
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 253, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815032
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 147, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815003
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 241, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815014
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 251, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815025
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 254, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815036
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 193, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815007
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 249, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815018
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 252, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815029
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 249, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815020
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 253, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815031
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 129, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815002
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 240, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815013
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 251, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815024
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 254, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815035
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 182, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815006
- Armitage, George;
- Wilson, Michael
- Article
29
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 247, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815017
- Rajasingham, A. S.;
- Cooray, G. H.
- Article
30
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 252, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815028
- Article
31
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 252, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815030
- Article
32
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815001
- Article
33
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 239, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815012
- Article
34
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 250, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815023
- Article
35
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 254, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815034
- Article
36
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 175, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815005
- Article
37
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 245, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815016
- Article
38
- British Journal of Surgery, 1950, v. 38, n. 150, p. 252, doi. 10.1002/bjs.18003815027
- Article