Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1929 AND VI 17 AND IP 65
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 114, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176511
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 190, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176522
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 7, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176504
- Edwards, Harold;
- Dukes, Cuthbert
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 186, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176515
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 192, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176526
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 84, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176508
- Sargent, Percy;
- Greenfield, J. Godwin
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 188, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176519
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 34, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176507
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 190, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176521
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 1, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176503
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 184, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176514
- Hartfall, S. J.;
- Heseltine, L. B.
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 191, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176525
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 110, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176510
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 188, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176518
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 189, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176520
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. i, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176502
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 182, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176513
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 191, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176524
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 30, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176506
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 187, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176517
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 192, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176528
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176501
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 179, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176512
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 191, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176523
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 22, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176505
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 187, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176516
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 192, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176527
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1929, v. 17, n. 65, p. 102, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800176509
- Article