Works matching IS 00071323 AND DT 1921 AND VI 9 AND IP 35
1
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 449, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093511
- Article
2
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 470, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093522
- Article
3
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 338, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093504
- Article
4
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 464, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093515
- Article
5
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 471, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093526
- Article
6
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 431, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093508
- Article
7
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 468, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093519
- Article
8
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 445, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093510
- Article
9
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 469, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093521
- Article
10
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 334, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093503
- Article
11
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 462, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093514
- Article
12
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 471, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093525
- Article
13
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 422, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093507
- Article
14
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 467, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093518
- Article
15
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 469, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093520
- Article
16
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 321, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093502
- Pickerill, H. P.;
- White, J. Renfrew
- Article
17
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 458, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093513
- Article
18
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 471, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093524
- Article
19
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 408, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093506
- Waring, H. J.;
- Milligan, E. T. C.
- Article
20
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 465, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093517
- Article
21
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 472, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093528
- Article
22
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. fmi, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093501
- Article
23
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 450, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093512
- Article
24
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 470, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093523
- Article
25
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 366, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093505
- Article
26
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 464, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093516
- Article
27
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 472, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093527
- Article
28
- British Journal of Surgery, 1921, v. 9, n. 35, p. 438, doi. 10.1002/bjs.1800093509
- Article