Works matching IS 00070963 AND DT 1932 AND VI 44 AND IP 5
1
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 233, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09598.x
- Article
2
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 273, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09603.x
- Article
3
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 295, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09606.x
- Article
4
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 260, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09602.x
- Article
5
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 282, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09605.x
- Article
6
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 253, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09600.x
- KERTÉSZ (ÚJPEST), GÉZA;
- GOLDNER, VICTOR
- Article
7
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 257, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09601.x
- MACLEOD, J. M. H.;
- WIGLEY, J. E. M.;
- MUENDE, I.
- Article
8
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 241, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09599.x
- Article
9
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 274, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09604.x
- Article
10
- British Journal of Dermatology, 1932, v. 44, n. 5, p. 296, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1932.tb09607.x
- Article