Critique of Pure Folly.
- Published in:
- Botanical Review, 2003, v. 69, n. 1, p. 79, doi. 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0079:COPF]2.0.CO;2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching IS 00068101 AND DT 2003 AND VI 69 AND IP 1
Results: 7
1
2
The Illogical Basis of Phylogenetic Nomenclature.
- Published in:
- Botanical Review, 2003, v. 69, n. 1, p. 93, doi. 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0093:TIBOPN]2.0.CO;2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
The PhyloCode Is Fatally Flawed, and the "Linnaean" System Can Easily Be Fixed.
- Published in:
- Botanical Review, 2003, v. 69, n. 1, p. 111, doi. 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0111:TPIFFA]2.0.CO;2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
The Linnaean System and Its 250-Year Persistence.
- Published in:
- Botanical Review, 2003, v. 69, n. 1, p. 59, doi. 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0059:TLSAIY]2.0.CO;2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Apomorphy-Based Definition Also Pinpoints a Node, and PhyloCode Names Prevent Effective Communication.
- Published in:
- Botanical Review, 2003, v. 69, n. 1, p. 44, doi. 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0044:ADAPAN]2.0.CO;2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
Is the Neotropical Flora Ready for the PhyloCode?
- Published in:
- Botanical Review, 2003, v. 69, n. 1, p. 22, doi. 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0022:ITNFRF]2.0.CO;2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
Should Taxon Names Be Explicitly Defined?
- Published in:
- Botanical Review, 2003, v. 69, n. 1, p. 2, doi. 10.1663/0006-8101(2003)069[0002:STNBED]2.0.CO;2
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article