WHY DWYER GOT IT WRONG: A CALL TO REBALANCE THE SCALE AND PROTECT ABSOLUTE PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATIONS BETWEEN SEXUAL ASSAULT VICTIMS AND COUNSELORS.Published in:Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1523By:Monahan, Meagen K.Publication type:Article
THE EVOLUTION OF MARRIAGE: THE ROLE OF DIGNITY JURISPRUDENCE AND MARRIAGE EQUALITY.Published in:Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1489By:Haddad, Jasmine J.Publication type:Article
THE MORAL READING AS A PRACTICE: A RESPONSE TO THREE COMMENTS ON FIDELITY TO OUR IMPERFECT CONSTITUTION.Published in:2016By:FLEMING, JAMES E.Publication type:Book Review
REFLECTIONS OF AN EMPIRICAL READER (OR: COULD FLEMING BE RIGHT THIS TIME?).Published in:2016By:LAWSON, GARYPublication type:Book Review
A SYMPOSIUM ON JAMES E. FLEMING'S FIDELITY TO OUR IMPERFECT CONSTITUTION: FOR MORAL READINGS AND AGAINST ORIGINALISMS.Published in:2016By:BALKIN, JACK M.Publication type:Book Review
COMPARATIVE MATTERS: RESPONSE TO INTERLOCUTORS.Published in:2016By:HIRSCHL, RANPublication type:Book Review
ON WHAT MATTERS IN COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW: A COMMENT ON HIRSCHL.Published in:2016By:YOUNG, KATHARINE G.Publication type:Book Review
COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, LEGAL REALISM, AND EMPIRICAL LEGAL SCIENCE.Published in:Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1359By:JACKSON, VICKI C.Publication type:Article
HOW TO STUDY CONSTITUTION-MAKING: HIRSCHL, ELSTER, AND THE SEVENTH INNING PROBLEM.Published in:Boston University Law Review, 2016, v. 96, n. 4, p. 1347By:GINSBURG, TOMPublication type:Article
A SYMPOSIUM ON RAN HIRSCHL'S COMPARATIVE MATTERS: THE RENAISSANCE OF COMPARATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL LAW.Published in:2016By:DI ROBILANT, ANNAPublication type:Book Review