A SPOOF OF JUSTICE: DOUBLE JEOPARDY IMPLICATIONS FOR CONVICTIONS OF BOTH SPOOFING AND COMMODITIES FRAUD FOR THE SAME TRANSACTION.Published in:American University Law Review, 2015, v. 65, n. 1, p. 239By:OLCHYK, ABRAMPublication type:Article
THE HARMS OF THE BENEFIT CORPORATION.Published in:American University Law Review, 2015, v. 65, n. 1, p. 151By:EL KHATIB, KENNANPublication type:Article
IQ, INTELLIGENCE TESTS, "ETHNIC ADJUSTMENTS" AND ATKINS.Published in:American University Law Review, 2015, v. 65, n. 1, p. 87By:SANGER, ROBERT M.Publication type:Article
IF THE QUESTION IS CHOCOLATE-RELATED, THE ANSWER IS ALWAYS YES: WHY DOE V. NESTLE REOPENS THE DOOR FOR CORPORATE LIABILITY OF U.S. CORPORATIONS UNDER THE ALIEN TORT STATUTE.Published in:American University Law Review, 2015, v. 65, n. 1, p. 191By:HUMPEIREVILLE, AMANDA A.Publication type:Article
U.S. TAX IMPERIALISM IN PUERTO RICO.Published in:American University Law Review, 2015, v. 65, n. 1, p. 1By:DICK, DIANE LOURDESPublication type:Article