JUDGING IN A VACUUM, OR, ONCE MORE, WITHOUT FEELING: HOW JUSTICE SCALIA'S JURISPRUDENTIAL APPROACH REPEATS ERRORS MADE IN PLESSY V. FERGUSON.Published in:Akron Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 513By:Edelson, ChrisPublication type:Article
THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT AND THE UNCONSTITUTIONALITY OF SECESSION.Published in:Akron Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 479By:Farber, Daniel A.Publication type:Article
STATES' RIGHTS, SOUTHERN HYPOCRISY, AND THE CRISIS OF THE UNION.Published in:Akron Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 449By:Finkelman, PaulPublication type:Article
JAMES MADISON AND THE CONSTITUTION'S "CONVENTION FOR PROPOSING AMENDMENTS.".Published in:Akron Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 431By:Natelson, Robert G.Publication type:Article
SECESSION AND BREACH OF COMPACT: THE LAW OF NATURE MEETS THE UNITED STATES CONSTITUTION.Published in:Akron Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 405By:Neff, Stephen C.Publication type:Article
STILL TOO CLOSE TO CALL? RETHINKING STAMPP'S "THE CONCEPT OF A PERPETUAL UNION.".Published in:Akron Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 395By:Hamilton, Daniel W.Publication type:Article
PREFACE.Published in:Akron Law Review, 2012, v. 45, n. 2, p. 389By:Cogan, Neil H.Publication type:Article