The Exclusionary Rule and Causation: Hudson v. Michigan and Its Ancestors.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2008, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1741
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
Works matching Hudson v. Michigan
Results: 18
1
2
Hudson v. Michigan: "Knock-and-Announce"--An Outdated Rule?
- Published in:
- BYU Journal of Public Law, 2007, p. 433
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
3
ALTERNATIVES TO THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE AFTER HUDSON v. MICHIGAN: PREVENTING AND REMEDYING POLICE MISCONDUCT.
- Published in:
- Villanova Law Review, 2008, v. 53, n. 1, p. 47
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
4
Excluding the Exclusionary Rule: Extending the Rationale of Hudson v. Michigan to Evidence Seized During Unauthorized Nighttime Searches.
- Published in:
- Brigham Young University Law Review, 2007, v. 2007, n. 2, p. 451
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
5
Hudson v. Michigan and the Future of Fourth Amendment Exclusion.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2008, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1819
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
6
DON'T KNOCK THEM UNTIL WE TRY THEM: CIVIL SUITS AS A REMEDY FOR KNOCK-AND-ANNOUNCE VIOLATIONS AFTER Hudson v. Michigan, 126 S. Ct. 2159 (2006).
- Published in:
- Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, 2006, v. 30, n. 1, p. 417
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
7
THE "NEW" EXCLUSIONARY RULE DEBATE: FROM "STILL PREOCCUPIED WITH 1985" TO "VIRTUAL DETERRENCE".
- Published in:
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2010, v. 37, n. 3, p. 743
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
8
MOVING TARGETS: PLACING THE GOOD FAITH DOCTRINE IN THE CONTEXT OF FRAGMENTED POLICING.
- Published in:
- Fordham Urban Law Journal, 2010, v. 37, n. 3, p. 709
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
9
THE REMEDY OF LAST RESORT.
- Published in:
- Widener Law Review, 2017, v. 23, n. 1, p. 115
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
10
HUDSON V. MICHIGAN AND THE ONGOING STRUGGLE FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IN LAW ENFORCEMENT INSTITUTIONS.
- Published in:
- Albany Government Law Review, 2013, v. 6, n. 2, p. 603
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
11
IS THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE DEAD?
- Published in:
- Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 2012, v. 102, n. 1, p. 1
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
12
RECONCEIVING THE FOURTH AMENDMENT AND THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.
- Published in:
- Law & Contemporary Problems, 2010, v. 73, n. 3, p. 211
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
13
Hudson v. Michigan and the decline of the exclusionary rule.
- Published in:
- Police Practice & Research, 2012, v. 13, n. 3, p. 282, doi. 10.1080/15614263.2011.627740
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
14
Waiting for the Other Shoe: Hudson and the Precarious State of Mapp.
- Published in:
- Iowa Law Review, 2008, v. 93, n. 5, p. 1725
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
15
BIG BILL HAYWOOD'S REVENGE: THE ORIGINAL INTENT OF THE EXCLUSIONARY RULE.
- Published in:
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2009, v. 22, n. 1, p. 35
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
16
VIRGIANID BRACHIOPODS OF THE MICHIGAN BASIN, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR POST-EXTINCTION DIVERSIFICATION OF THE SILURIAN PENTAMERIDE FAUNA IN LAURENTIA.
- Published in:
- Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 2019, v. 125, n. 3, p. 637
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
17
ILLEGAL SEARCHES IN CHICAGO: THE OUTCOMES OF 42 U.S.C. § 1983 LITIGATION.
- Published in:
- St. Louis University Public Law Review, 2012, v. 32, n. 1, p. 123
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article
18
A CLASH OF DOCTRINES: THE CASTLE DOCTRINE AND THE KNOCK-AND-ANNOUNCE RULE.
- Published in:
- Widener Law Journal, 2016, v. 25, n. 2, p. 171
- By:
- Publication type:
- Article