Works matching Great Britain. Bill of Rights
1
- Government & Opposition, 2009, v. 44, n. 1, p. 20, doi. 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2008.01274.x
- Article
5
- Northwestern Journal of Human Rights, 2018, v. 16, n. 1, p. 22
- Boyle, Katie;
- Cochrane, Leanne
- Article
6
- Human Rights Law Review, 2014, v. 14, n. 1, p. 107, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngt047
- Article
7
- Judicial Review, 2009, v. 14, n. 1, p. 35, doi. 10.1080/10854681.2009.11426586
- Article
8
- Political Quarterly, 2012, v. 83, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02349.x
- Article
10
- Political Quarterly, 1986, v. 57, n. 4, p. 414, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.1986.tb00733.x
- Article
12
- German Law Journal, 2013, v. 14, n. 12, p. 2253, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200002765
- Article
13
- Journal of Legal History, 2018, v. 39, n. 2, p. 187, doi. 10.1080/01440365.2018.1484324
- Article
14
- Textual Practice, 2010, v. 24, n. 5, p. 791, doi. 10.1080/0950236X.2010.484590
- Article
15
- IDP: Revista de Internet, Derecho y Politica, 2019, v. 29, p. 1, doi. 10.7238/idp.v0i29.3157
- Article
16
- Political Quarterly, 2012, v. 83, n. 3, p. 466, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2012.02348.x
- Article
17
- Political Quarterly, 2009, v. 80, n. 1, p. 25, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.01964.x
- Article
19
- Parliamentary Affairs, 1990, v. 43, n. 1, p. 27
- Article
20
- Nursing Older People, 2006, v. 17, n. 10, p. 6, doi. 10.7748/nop.17.10.6.s9
- Article
21
- Nursing Standard, 2008, v. 22, n. 17, p. 29
- Article
22
- Nursing Standard, 2006, v. 21, n. 9, p. 26, doi. 10.7748/ns.21.9.26.s25
- Article
23
- King's Law Journal, 2009, v. 20, n. 1, p. 115, doi. 10.1080/09615768.2009.11427723
- Article
24
- HIV Australia, 2009, p. 6
- Article
25
- European Competition Journal, 2014, v. 10, n. 3, p. 435, doi. 10.5235/17441056.10.3.435
- Article
26
- Australian Journal of Political Science, 2009, v. 44, n. 1, p. 29, doi. 10.1080/10361140802654976
- Chesterman, John;
- Galligan, Brian
- Article
27
- Political Quarterly, 1977, v. 48, n. 4, p. 484, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.1977.tb00146.x
- Article
28
- Political Quarterly, 1976, v. 47, n. 4, p. 473, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.1976.tb02208.x
- Article
29
- Political Quarterly, 1976, v. 47, n. 2, p. 137, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-923X.1976.tb02173.x
- Article
30
- Chemistry & Industry, 2005, n. 3, p. 4
- Article
31
- Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), 2001, v. 165, n. 6, p. 810
- Article
32
- Socialist Lawyer, 2016, n. 72, p. 10, doi. 10.13169/socialistlawyer.72.0010
- Article
33
- University of New South Wales Law Journal, 2010, v. 33, n. 1, p. 171
- Article
34
- Journal of Criminal Law, 2003, v. 67, n. 6, p. 486, doi. 10.1350/jcla.67.6.486.19440
- Article
36
- British Journal of Nursing, 2004, v. 13, n. 17, p. 1011
- Article
37
- Education Journal, 2007, n. 101, p. 37
- Article
38
- British Journal of Industrial Relations, 1970, v. 8, n. 3, p. 350, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8543.1970.tb00582.x
- Article
39
- St. Thomas Law Review, 2012, v. 24, n. 2, p. 252
- Article
40
- Common Law World Review, 2016, v. 45, n. 2/3, p. 101, doi. 10.1177/1473779516660486
- Liu, Hin Ting;
- Chan, Joshua
- Article
41
- Critical Quarterly, 1984, v. 26, n. 1/2, p. 87, doi. 10.1111/j.1467-8705.1984.tb00702.x
- Article
42
- Modern Law Review, 2017, v. 80, n. 6, p. 1111, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12304
- FENwick, HelEN;
- Masterman, Roger
- Article
43
- Texas Review of Law & Politics, 2014, v. 19, n. 1, p. 25
- Article
44
- Northwestern University Law Review, 2014, v. 108, n. 2, p. 543
- Article
45
- Law & Financial Markets Review, 2012, v. 6, n. 4, p. 292, doi. 10.5235/LFMR6.4.292
- Article
47
- Political Studies Review, 2014, v. 12, n. 1, p. 125, doi. 10.1111/1478-9302.12041_59
- Article
48
- Parliamentary Affairs, 2014, v. 67, n. 1, p. 80, doi. 10.1093/pa/gst023
- Article
49
- Liverpool Law Review, 2017, v. 38, n. 3, p. 287, doi. 10.1007/s10991-017-9202-x
- Article
50
- Journal of Media Law, 2023, v. 15, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1080/17577632.2023.2213914
- Article