Works matching Gleason grading system

Results: 2152

Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8–10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system.

Published in:

Cancer Medicine, 2021, v. 10, n. 1, p. 87, doi. 10.1002/cam4.3571

By:

Zhou, Yuan;
Lin, Changming;
Hu, Zhihua;
Yang, Cheng;
Zhang, Rentao;
Ding, Yinman;
Wang, Zhengquan;
Tao, Sha;
Qin, Yanmei

Publication type:

Article

Prognostic Stratification of Prostatic Cancer According to Modified Gleason Grading System.

Published in:

Journal of Rawalpindi Medical College, 2016, v. 20, n. 4, p. 281

By:

Khan, Mir Attaullah;
Shah, Hamidullah;
Gul, Meena

Publication type:

Article

COMPARISON OF CONVENTIONAL AND MODIFIED GLEASON GRADING SYSTEMS.

Published in:

Frontiers in Health Informatics, 2024, v. 13, n. 8, p. 4304

By:

Ali, Farhana;
Arshad, Madiha;
Afroze, Sana;
Saleem, Khadija

Publication type:

Article

Literature Review on The Evolutional Steps in Updating Gleason Grading System of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

Published in:

Kerbala Jorunal of Medicine, 2020, v. 13, n. 1, p. 2253

By:

Hassan, Farah Falah

Publication type:

Article

Clinical Validation of the 2005 ISUP Gleason Grading System in a Cohort of Intermediate and High Risk Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy.

Published in:

PLoS ONE, 2016, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1371/journal.pone.0146189

By:

Faraj, Sheila F.;
Bezerra, Stephania M.;
Yousefi, Kasra;
Fedor, Helen;
Glavaris, Stephanie;
Han, Misop;
Partin, Alan W.;
Humphreys, Elizabeth;
Tosoian, Jeffrey;
Johnson, Michael H.;
Davicioni, Elai;
Trock, Bruce J.;
Schaeffer, Edward M.;
Ross, Ashley E.;
Netto, George J.

Publication type:

Article

Yet Another Automated Gleason Grading System (YAAGGS) by weakly supervised deep learning.

Published in:

NPJ Digital Medicine, 2021, v. 4, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1038/s41746-021-00469-6

By:

Mun, Yechan;
Paik, Inyoung;
Shin, Su-Jin;
Kwak, Tae-Yeong;
Chang, Hyeyoon

Publication type:

Article

Gleason Grading System, Modifications and Additions to the Original Scheme.

Published in:

Turkish Journal of Pathology, 2009, v. 25, n. 3, p. 59, doi. 10.5146/tjpath.2009.00975

By:

Baydar, Dilek Ertoy;
Epstein, Jonathan I.

Publication type:

Article

Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.

Published in:

BJU International, 2009, v. 103, n. 9, p. 1190, doi. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2008.08197.x

By:

Uemura, Hiroji;
Hoshino, Koji;
Sasaki, Takeshi;
Miyoshi, Yasuhide;
Ishiguro, Hitoshi;
Inayama, Yoshiaki;
Kubota, Yoshinobu

Publication type:

Article

Low-Risk Prostate Cancer and Tumor Upgrading to Higher Patterns in the Surgical Specimen. Analysis of Clinical Factors Predicting Tumor Upgrading to Higher Gleason Patterns in a Contemporary Series of Patients Who Have Been Evaluated According to the Modified Gleason Score Grading System

Published in:

Urologia Internationalis, 2016, v. 97, n. 1, p. 32, doi. 10.1159/000445034

By:

Porcaro, antonio Benito;
Siracusano, Salvatore;
De Luyk, Nicolò;
Corsi, Paolo;
Sebben, Marco;
Tafuri, alessandro;
Bizzotto, Leonardo;
Tamanini, Irene;
Inverardi, Davide;
Cerruto, Maria angela;
Martignoni, Guido;
Brunelli, Matteo;
artibani, Walter

Publication type:

Article

Once again Gleason remains the grading system to beat: a comparison with using percentage pattern 4/5.

Published in:

2014

By:

Epstein, Jonathan I.

Publication type:

Editorial

Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade.

Published in:

Clinical Epidemiology, 2022, v. 14, p. 59, doi. 10.2147/CLEP.S339140

By:

Zelic, Renata;
Giunchi, Francesca;
Fridfeldt, Jonna;
Carlsson, Jessica;
Davidsson, Sabina;
Lianas, Luca;
Mascia, Cecilia;
Zugna, Daniela;
Molinaro, Luca;
Vincent, Per Henrik;
Zanetti, Gianluigi;
Andrén, Ove;
Richiardi, Lorenzo;
Akre, Olof;
Fiorentino, Michelangelo;
Pettersson, Andreas

Publication type:

Article

Comparison of Japanese General Rules of Prostatic Cancer and Gleason grading system.

Published in:

International Journal of Urology, 2001, v. 8, n. 10, p. 539, doi. 10.1046/j.1442-2042.2001.00368.x

By:

Fukagai, Takashi;
Namiki, Thomas;
Carlile, Robert G.;
Sugawara, So;
Morita, Masashi;
Shimada, Makoto;
Yoshida, Hideki;
Namiki, Hideo

Publication type:

Article

Establishment of a prognostic risk model for prostate cancer based on Gleason grading and cuprotosis related genes.

Published in:

Journal of Cancer Research & Clinical Oncology, 2024, v. 150, n. 8, p. 1, doi. 10.1007/s00432-024-05899-9

By:

Wang, Haicheng;
Xie, Meiyi;
Zhao, Yuming;
Zhang, Yong

Publication type:

Article

Evaluation of CD10 Expression and Its Relationship with Gleason Score in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

Published in:

Journal of Babol University of Medical Sciences, 2021, v. 23, n. 1, p. 60

By:

Ghasemi, A.;
Nadoushan, M. Jalali;
Sedaghat, R.

Publication type:

Article

Isolated pulmonary metastatic disease from prostate cancer as an initial symptom in a patient following transurethral resection of the prostate for benign disease with normal histopathology.

Published in:

2025

By:

Tsakaldimis, Georgios;
Diamantidis, Dimitrios;
Pappas-Gogos, George;
Valsamaki, Pipitsa;
Mulita, Francesk;
Giannakopoulos, Stilianos;
Kalaitzis, Christos

Publication type:

Case Study

Prognostic significance of invasive cribriform gland size and percentage in Gleason score 7 prostate adenocarcinoma.

Published in:

American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2024, v. 162, n. 6, p. 632, doi. 10.1093/ajcp/aqae082

By:

Tekin, Emel;
Şeker, Nazlı Sena;
Özen, Ata;
Açıkalın, Mustafa Fuat;
Can, Cavit;
Çolak, Ertuğrul

Publication type:

Article

Old men with prostate cancer have higher risk of Gleason score upgrading and pathological upstaging after initial diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Published in:

2021

By:

Wang, Xiaochuan;
Zhang, Yu;
Ji, Zhengguo;
Yang, Peiqian;
Tian, Ye

Publication type:

Literature Review

Application of Gleason analogous grading system and flow cytometry DNA analysis in a novel knock-in mouse prostate cancer model.

Published in:

Postgraduate Medical Journal, 2006, v. 82, n. 963, p. 40, doi. 10.1136/pgmj.2005.038042

By:

Wu, G.;
Lei Yu;
Wang, L.;
Wang, H.;
Xuan, J. W.

Publication type:

Article

Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.

Published in:

Diagnostic Pathology, 2016, v. 11, p. 1, doi. 10.1186/s13000-016-0478-2

By:

Gordetsky, Jennifer;
Epstein, Jonathan

Publication type:

Article

Will the Modification of the Gleason Grading System Affect the Urology Practice?

Published in:

International Journal of Surgical Pathology, 2010, v. 18, n. 4, p. 248, doi. 10.1177/1066896909346272

By:

Ozok, Hakki Ugur;
Sagnak, Levent;
Tuygun, Can;
Oktay, Murat;
Karakoyunlu, Nihat;
Ersoy, Hamit;
Alper, Murat

Publication type:

Article

GLEASON SCORE VERSUS GLEASON GRADE GROUP CONCORDANCE ON PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY.

Published in:

Acta Medica Marisiensis, 2016, v. 62, p. 75

By:

Andrada, Loghin;
C., Chibelean;
V. B., Halațiu;
Angela, Borda

Publication type:

Article

Metastatic potential to regional lymph nodes with Gleason score ≤7, including tertiary pattern 5, at radical prostatectomy.

Published in:

BJU International, 2017, v. 119, n. 6, p. 872, doi. 10.1111/bju.13623

By:

Diolombi, Mairo L.;
Epstein, Jonathan I.

Publication type:

Article

Prostate cancer grading: recent developments and future directions.

Published in:

BJU International, 2016, v. 117, p. 7, doi. 10.1111/bju.13467

By:

Delahunt, Brett;
Egevad, Lars;
Grignon, David J;
Srigley, John R;
Samaratunga, Hema

Publication type:

Article

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system.

Published in:

BJU International, 2013, v. 111, n. 5, p. 753, doi. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x

By:

Pierorazio, Phillip M.;
Walsh, Patrick C.;
Partin, Alan W.;
Epstein, Jonathan I.

Publication type:

Article

Multi-Stage Classification-Based Deep Learning for Gleason System Grading Using Histopathological Images.

Published in:

Cancers, 2022, v. 14, n. 23, p. 5897, doi. 10.3390/cancers14235897

By:

Hammouda, Kamal;
Khalifa, Fahmi;
Alghamdi, Norah Saleh;
Darwish, Hanan;
El-Baz, Ayman

Publication type:

Article

A New Validated Prostate Cancer Grading System.

Published in:

AUANews, 2015, v. 20, n. 6, p. 23

By:

Epstein, Jonathan I.

Publication type:

Article

Does the New Proposal for Prostate Cancer Grading Correlate With CAPRA Score?

Published in:

Urology Journal, 2018, v. 15, n. 6, p. 355

By:

Isikay, Levent;
Tonyali, Senol;
Aydog, Gulden

Publication type:

Article

Interobserver variability in Gleason histological grading of prostate cancer.

Published in:

Scandinavian Journal of Urology (Taylor & Francis Ltd), 2016, v. 50, n. 6, p. 420, doi. 10.1080/21681805.2016.1206619

By:

Ozkan, Tayyar A.;
Eruyar, Ahmet T.;
Cebeci, Oguz O.;
Memik, Omur;
Ozcan, Levent;
Kuskonmaz, Ibrahim

Publication type:

Article

Editorial Comment to Prognostic significance of tertiary Gleason pattern in the contemporary era of Gleason grade grouping: A narrative review.

Published in:

International Journal of Urology, 2021, v. 28, n. 6, p. 621, doi. 10.1111/iju.14535

By:

Tsuzuki, Toyonori

Publication type:

Article

Gleason grading: past, present and future.

Published in:

Histopathology, 2012, v. 60, n. 1, p. 75, doi. 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2011.04003.x

By:

Delahunt, Brett;
Miller, Rose J;
Srigley, John R;
Evans, Andrew J;
Samaratunga, Hemamali

Publication type:

Article

High mortality risk of prostate cancer patients in Asia and West Africa: A systematic review.

Published in:

Avicenna Journal of Medicine, 2020, v. 10, n. 3, p. 93, doi. 10.4103/AJM.AJM_19_20

By:

Okoye, Jude

Publication type:

Article

Prostate cancer prediction through a hybrid deep learning method applied to histopathological image.

Published in:

Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy, 2025, v. 25, n. 7, p. 829, doi. 10.1080/14737140.2025.2512040

By:

Poonkuzhali, P.;
Krishnamoorthy, R.;
Nimma, Divya;
Ramesh, Janjhyam Venkata Naga

Publication type:

Article

International Society of Urological Pathology ( ISUP) grading of prostate cancer - An ISUP consensus on contemporary grading.

Published in:

2016

By:

Egevad, Lars;
Delahunt, Brett;
Srigley, John R;
Samaratunga, Hemamali

Publication type:

Editorial

Prognostic significance of global grading system of Gleason score in patients with prostate cancer with bone metastasis.

Published in:

BJU International, 2010, v. 105, n. 11, p. 1519, doi. 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.09048.x

By:

Kambara, Tsunehito;
Oyama, Tetsunari;
Segawa, Atsuki;
Fukabori, Yoshitatsu;
Yoshida, Ken-Ichiro

Publication type:

Article

USEFULNESS OF THE 2005 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF UROLOGICAL PATHOLOGY GLEASON GRADING SYSTEM IN PROSTATE BIOPSY AND RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENS.

Published in:

2009

By:

Trpkov, Kiril;
Jianguo Zhang

Publication type:

Letter

Transfer Learning with Pretrained Convolutional Neural Network for Automated Gleason Grading of Prostate Cancer Tissue Microarrays.

Published in:

Journal of Medical Signals & Sensors, 2024, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.4103/jmss.jmss_42_22

By:

Gifani, Parisa;
Shalbaf, Ahmad

Publication type:

Article

miR-145-5p: A Potential Biomarker in Predicting Gleason Upgrading of Prostate Biopsy Samples Scored 3+3=6.

Published in:

Cancer Management & Research, 2021, v. 13, p. 9095, doi. 10.2147/CMAR.S336671

By:

Wang, Tao;
Dong, Lei;
Sun, Juanjuan;
Shao, Jialiang;
Zhang, Jian;
Chen, Siteng;
Wang, Chaofu;
Wu, Gangfeng;
Wang, Xiang

Publication type:

Article

Significance of p53 and ki-67 expression in prostate cancer.

Published in:

Urology Annals, 2015, v. 7, n. 4, p. 488, doi. 10.4103/0974-7796.158507

By:

Verma, Renuka;
Gupta, Veena;
Singh, Jagjeet;
Verma, Monica;
Gupta, Gopal;
Gupta, Sumiti;
Sen, Rajeev;
Ralli, Megha

Publication type:

Article

MORFOLOŠKI PARAMETRI ADENOKARCINOMA PROSTATE.

Published in:

Medical Review / Medicinski Pregled, 2007, v. 60, n. 11/12, p. 549, doi. 10.2298/MPNS0712549T

By:

Trivunić, Sandra;
Budakov, Pavle;
Vučković, Nada;
Živojinov, Mirjana

Publication type:

Article

Patients ask and pathologists answer: ten questions around prostate cancer grading.

Published in:

Virchows Archiv: European Journal of Pathology, 2025, v. 486, n. 5, p. 1091, doi. 10.1007/s00428-024-03891-9

By:

Cimadamore, Alessia;
Cheng, Liang;
Lopez-Beltran, Antonio;
Franzese, Carmine;
Giannarini, Gianluca;
Crestani, Alessandro;
Rogers, Eamonn T.;
Montironi, Rodolfo

Publication type:

Article

Development of a deep learning system for predicting biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer.

Published in:

BMC Cancer, 2025, v. 25, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1186/s12885-025-13628-9

By:

Cao, Lu;
He, Ruimin;
Zhang, Ao;
Li, Lingmei;
Cao, Wenfeng;
Liu, Ning;
Zhang, Peisen

Publication type:

Article

Predictive efficacy of the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology Gleason grading system in initially diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer.

Published in:

Asian Journal of Andrology, 2017, v. 19, n. 5, p. 573, doi. 10.4103/1008-682X.186184

By:

Guang-Xi Sun;
Peng-Fei Shen;
Xing-Ming Zhang;
Jing Gong;
Hao-Jun Gui;
Kun-Peng Shu;
Jiang-Dong Liu;
Jinge Zhao;
Yao-Jing Yang;
Xue-Qin Chen;
Ni Chen;
Hao Zeng

Publication type:

Article

New Assessment of Gleason Grading System in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma.

Published in:

Journal of Urological Surgery, 2016, v. 3, n. 1, p. 36, doi. 10.4274/jus.796

By:

Kaııpmaz, Şükran Sarıkaya

Publication type:

Article

Interchangeability of light and virtual microscopy for histopathological evaluation of prostate cancer.

Published in:

Scientific Reports, 2021, v. 11, n. 1, p. 1, doi. 10.1038/s41598-021-82911-z

By:

Zelic, Renata;
Giunchi, Francesca;
Lianas, Luca;
Mascia, Cecilia;
Zanetti, Gianluigi;
Andrén, Ove;
Fridfeldt, Jonna;
Carlsson, Jessica;
Davidsson, Sabina;
Molinaro, Luca;
Vincent, Per Henrik;
Richiardi, Lorenzo;
Akre, Olof;
Fiorentino, Michelangelo;
Pettersson, Andreas

Publication type:

Article

Androgen Receptor as a Prognostic Marker in Adenocarcinoma Prostate.

Published in:

Biomedica, 2019, v. 35, n. 1, p. 29

By:

G., Fatima;
S., Niazi;
R., Jaffer

Publication type:

Article

Histopathological Pattern of Prostate Carcinoma using New Grading System in a Tertiary Centre of Saudi Arabia.

Published in:

Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 2019, v. 13, n. 4, p. 1, doi. 10.7860/JCDR/2019/38151.12752

By:

HAIDER, NAZIMA;
FATIMA, SOHAILA;
ADIGA, BALA KRISHNAMOORTHY;
MIRZA, NIHAL

Publication type:

Article

A Comparative Histopathologic Analysis of Prostatic Carcinomas by Conventional and 2005 ISUP Modified Gleason Systems.

Published in:

Journal of Clinical & Diagnostic Research, 2018, v. 12, n. 12, p. 10, doi. 10.7860/JCDR/2018/32600.12374

By:

DALMEIDA, DEBORAH;
UMASHANKAR, T.;
SALDANHA, CRYSLE

Publication type:

Article

The quantitative Gleason score improves prostate cancer risk assessment.

Published in:

Cancer (0008543X), 2012, v. 118, n. 24, p. 6046, doi. 10.1002/cncr.27670

By:

Reese, Adam C.;
Cowan, Janet E.;
Brajtbord, Jonathan S.;
Harris, Catherine R.;
Carroll, Peter R.;
Cooperberg, Matthew R.

Publication type:

Article

External validation of an artificial intelligence model for Gleason grading of prostate cancer on prostatectomy specimens.

Published in:

BJU International, 2025, v. 135, n. 1, p. 133, doi. 10.1111/bju.16464

By:

Schmidt, Bogdana;
Soerensen, Simon John Christoph;
Bhambhvani, Hriday P.;
Fan, Richard E.;
Bhattacharya, Indrani;
Choi, Moon Hyung;
Kunder, Christian A.;
Kao, Chia‐Sui;
Higgins, John;
Rusu, Mirabela;
Sonn, Geoffrey A.

Publication type:

Article

Gleason inflation 1998-2011: a registry study of 97 168 men.

Published in:

BJU International, 2015, v. 115, n. 2, p. 248, doi. 10.1111/bju.12671

By:

Danneman, Daniela;
Drevin, Linda;
Robinson, David;
Stattin, Pär;
Egevad, Lars

Publication type:

Article