Works matching Fundamental rights
1
- Jurisprudence / Jurisprudencija, 2012, v. 19, n. 4, p. 1269
- Article
2
- Zeszyty Prawnicze Biuro Analiz Sejmowej, 2013, v. 40, n. 4, p. 29
- Article
3
- Law Review: Judicial Doctrine & Case-Law, 2017, v. 2017, p. 22
- Article
4
- German Law Journal, 2019, v. 20, n. 6, p. 864, doi. 10.1017/glj.2019.66
- Article
5
- German Law Journal, 2019, v. 20, n. 6, p. 779, doi. 10.1017/glj.2019.62
- Article
6
- European Constitutional Law Review, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.1017/S1574019612001046
- Hofmann, Herwig C.H.;
- Mihaescu, C.
- Article
7
- Human Rights Law Review, 2014, v. 14, n. 2, p. 231, doi. 10.1093/hrlr/ngu009
- Article
8
- Annals of the Constantin Brancusi University of Targu Jiu-Letters & Social Sciences Series, 2012, n. 2, p. 80
- Article
9
- Icelandic Review on Politics & Administration, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 237, doi. 10.13177/irpa.a.2013.9.1.12
- Kristjánsdóttir, Margrét Vala
- Article
10
- Tilburg Law Review, 2020, v. 25, n. 1, p. 55, doi. 10.5334/tilr.193
- Article
11
- Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2012, v. 30, n. 2, p. 195, doi. 10.1177/016934411203000204
- Article
12
- Revista Română de Drept European, 2013, n. 4, p. 37
- Article
13
- European Competition & Regulatory Law Review, 2018, v. 2, n. 3, p. 232, doi. 10.21552/core/2018/3/11
- Article
14
- Information & Communications Technology Law, 2016, v. 25, n. 3, p. 292, doi. 10.1080/13600834.2016.1239564
- Flórez Rojas, Maria Lorena
- Article
15
- International Journal of Communication Research, 2013, v. 3, n. 2, p. 147
- Article
16
- Law Review: Judicial Doctrine & Case-Law, 2016, v. 6, n. 2, p. 97
- ŞANDRU, Daniel Mihail;
- BANU, Constantin Mihai;
- CĂLIN, Dragoş Alin
- Article
17
- Human Rights Review, 2014, v. 15, n. 1, p. 39, doi. 10.1007/s12142-013-0273-3
- Article
18
- Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 2010, v. 28, n. 1, p. 3, doi. 10.1177/016934411002800101
- Article
19
- Cyprus Review, 2018, v. 30, n. 2, p. 43
- Article
20
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 4, p. 374, doi. 10.5235/108546811799320835
- Article
21
- Judicial Review, 2011, v. 16, n. 3, p. 216, doi. 10.5235/108546811797434048
- Article
22
- European Data Protection Law Review (EDPL), 2021, v. 7, n. 2, p. 190, doi. 10.21552/edpl/2021/2/8
- von Grafenstein, Maximilian
- Article
23
- Review of European Administrative Law, 2013, v. 6, n. 2, p. 37
- Article
24
- Review of European Administrative Law, 2013, v. 6, n. 1, p. 113
- Article
25
- Revista de Derecho Politico, 2013, n. 87, p. 79
- LÓPEZ-POZAS, FERNANDO L. IBÁÑEZ
- Article
26
- GRUR International: Journal of European & International IP Law, 2021, v. 70, n. 6, p. 544, doi. 10.1093/grurint/ikaa185
- Article
27
- European Review of Contract Law, 2010, v. 6, n. 4, p. 409, doi. 10.1515/ERCL.2010.409
- Article
28
- Revista Daena: International Journal of Good Conscience, 2009, v. 4, n. 2, p. 278
- Article
29
- International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 2012, v. 26, n. 1, p. 73, doi. 10.1080/13600869.2012.646798
- Fuster, GloriaGonzález;
- Gellert, Raphaël
- Article
30
- Judicial Review, 2014, v. 19, n. 3, p. 160, doi. 10.5235/10854681.19.3.160
- Article
31
- Eastern Journal of European Studies, 2011, v. 2, n. 1, p. 57
- Article
32
- LESIJ - Lex ET Scientia International Journal, 2012, v. 19, n. 2, p. 180
- Article
33
- European Law Journal, 2017, v. 23, n. 1/2, p. 94, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12226
- Nicolosi, Salvatore Fabio
- Article
34
- European Law Journal, 2015, v. 21, n. 5, p. 657, doi. 10.1111/eulj.12137
- Article
35
- European Law Journal, 2012, v. 18, n. 2, p. 251, doi. 10.1111/j.1468-0386.2011.00596.x
- Article
36
- Judicial Review, 2012, v. 17, n. 3, p. 203, doi. 10.5235/108546812802915758
- Article
37
- George Washington International Law Review, 2017, v. 50, n. 1, p. 209
- Article
38
- Arbitration International, 2021, v. 37, n. 1, p. 197, doi. 10.1093/arbint/aiaa046
- QC, Gordon Nardell;
- Rees-Evans, Laura
- Article
39
- Modern Law Review, 2019, v. 82, n. 2, p. 350, doi. 10.1111/1468-2230.12407
- Article
40
- Review of European Administrative Law, 2014, v. 7, n. 1, p. 69, doi. 10.7590/187479814X14005849344739
- Article
41
- Liverpool Law Review, 2012, v. 33, n. 3, p. 281, doi. 10.1007/s10991-012-9121-9
- Article
42
- Turkish Yearbook of International Relations, 2015, v. 46, p. 47, doi. 10.1501/Intrel_0000000301
- Article
43
- Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, 2016, v. 7, n. 10, p. 711, doi. 10.1093/jeclap/lpw090
- Oliver, Peter;
- Bombois, Thomas
- Article
44
- Utrecht Law Review, 2013, v. 9, n. 1, p. 104, doi. 10.18352/ulr.216
- Article
45
- Pace International Law Review, 2016, v. 28, n. 1, p. 205, doi. 10.58948/2331-3536.1365
- Article
46
- Industrial Law Journal, 2001, v. 30, n. 2, p. 225, doi. 10.1093/ilj/30.2.225
- Article
47
- German Law Journal, 2017, v. 18, n. 4, p. 771, doi. 10.1017/s2071832200022161
- Article
48
- European Constitutional Law Review, 2015, v. 11, n. 3, p. 482, doi. 10.1017/S1574019615000255
- Article
49
- Revista Brasileira de Estudos Politicos, 2018, n. 117, p. 363, doi. 10.9732/p.0034-7191.2018v117p363
- Article
50
- Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica, 2018, v. 64, n. 4, p. 167, doi. 10.14712/23366478.2018.43
- Article